Insect Egg Harvesting With Removable Receiving Members

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The challenge of manually seeding individual rearing pots with exactly one insect egg is labor-intensive and difficult due to the fragility and texture of eggs, making robotic manipulation challenging.

Innovation Solution

An apparatus with a container, receiving members, and an actuator for removing and inspecting individual eggs, allowing efficient harvesting and processing while maintaining insect populations within the container.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual seeding of individual rearing pots with insect eggs is performed, then each egg can be isolated and monitored, but the process becomes very labor intensive and time consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveegg isolation accuracyVSAvoidharvesting speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the harvesting process into discrete segments by providing multiple receiving members (100) that can be independently removed from the container (2). Each receiving member can be individually inspected and processed, allowing parallel operation and significantly increasing throughput while maintaining precise egg isolation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The receiving member (100) acts as an intermediary carrier between the container (2) and the final processing stage. It provides a standardized interface that facilitates easy removal, inspection, and handling of eggs without direct manual manipulation, thereby increasing productivity while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If robotic manipulation is used to handle insect eggs, then labor intensity is reduced, but the process becomes difficult due to egg fragility and texture

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling easeVSAvoidegg integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The receiving member (100) serves as a robust intermediary that provides a stable platform for egg placement. Instead of directly manipulating fragile eggs with robotic mechanisms, the system places eggs onto the receiving member which then protects and transports them, significantly improving reliability while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The receiving member (100) can be designed as a disposable or easily replaceable component. This allows for simple, robust designs that prioritize ease of handling and egg protection over durability, with each receiving member being replaced after use rather than requiring complex protective mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Measurement precision

If all receiving members are removed from the container for inspection, then egg laying can be detected, but the insect population may escape or other receiving members with eggs are lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveegg detection accuracyVSAvoidinsect escape risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables selective removal of individual receiving members (100) from the container (2) based on inspection needs. Only specific receiving members that require verification can be removed, while others remain in place to contain insects and protect eggs, thereby reducing escape risk while maintaining detection accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The container (2) and receiving members (100) are designed with self-contained features that allow for easy identification of which receiving members need inspection. The system enables operators to selectively remove only those receiving members that require verification, reducing the need to handle all members and minimizing insect escape risk.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Productivity

If receiving members are frequently removed and replaced, then egg harvesting efficiency is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharvesting efficiencyVSAvoidapparatus complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the receiving members (100) into modular units that can be independently removed and replaced. This segmentation allows for simple, standardized interfaces that reduce the complexity of each individual component while enabling efficient harvesting through selective replacement of only those members containing eggs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The receiving member (100) is designed as a universal component that can be used repeatedly across multiple harvesting cycles. Its standardized design allows it to serve multiple functions: containing eggs during laying, facilitating inspection, and enabling efficient removal and replacement. This multi-functionality reduces overall system complexity while maintaining high harvesting efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12433267B2Egg harvesting apparatus
Publication Date: 2025.10.07 ZYZZLE LTD
  • US12433267B2 patent drawing
  • US12433267B2 patent drawing
  • US12433267B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus (1) with a container (2) for containing insects, a receiving member (200) upon which an insect in the container can lay an egg and an actuator (10) for removing the receiving member from the container once an egg has been laid upon the receiving member. The apparatus is for removing individual insect eggs from a container which contains many live insects. The individual eggs, once removed from the container, may be used in an individualized rearing process.