Modular Insect Habitat Inserts for Surface Area Expansion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current insect cultivation methods using single-use cardboard boxes or large wooden/concrete troughs are inefficient, prone to human error, and susceptible to pathogenic and fungal activity, leading to economic losses and wastage.

Innovation Solution

An automated rack system for insect cultivation that minimizes human interaction, featuring multiple levels, automated watering and feeding systems, and habitats with low-friction materials and modular inserts to increase surface area and reduce pathogen spread.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If single-use cardboard boxes are used for insect cultivation, then ease of operation is improved, but productivity deteriorates due to disposal requirements and significant expense

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidproductivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the cultivation container into a reusable outer housing and disposable inner liners. The housing structure (trough or container) is permanent and can be sterilized for reuse, while the inner liner is disposable and replaced between cycles. This segmentation allows the system to maintain ease of operation (like single-use boxes) while eliminating the productivity loss from disposing entire containers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies the disposable principle to the inner liner rather than the entire container. The inner liner is a cheap, disposable component that is replaced between cultivation cycles, while the expensive housing structure is reused. This resolves the contradiction by maintaining operational simplicity through easy liner replacement while improving productivity through reuse of the main container infrastructure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Ease of operation

If cardboard boxes are moved and serviced by hand, then ease of operation is improved, but reliability deteriorates due to insect damage or loss during human interaction

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of operationVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated feeding and watering mechanisms that allow the insect population to service itself without human intervention. Automated feeders dispense food, and watering systems provide moisture, eliminating the need for handlers to physically interact with the insects during critical care periods, thus maintaining reliability while preserving operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical handling with automated mechanical systems. Instead of human hands moving containers and providing care, automated mechanisms perform these functions. This substitution eliminates the reliability issues caused by human error while maintaining ease of operation through centralized automated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If large wooden or concrete troughs are used, then productivity is improved through increased capacity, but reliability deteriorates due to susceptibility to pathogenic and fungal activity

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidreliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the material parameter of the container from porous natural materials (wood, concrete) to non-porous synthetic materials (plastic, metal). This parameter change eliminates the susceptibility to pathogenic and fungal activity that plagues traditional large-scale troughs, thereby maintaining high productivity capacity while improving reliability through enhanced hygiene and disease resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses composite construction combining non-porous outer materials (resistant to pathogens) with removable inner liners. This composite approach allows the main structural component to provide large capacity for productivity while the liner material provides hygiene properties for reliability, resolving the contradiction between scale and disease resistance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Device complexity

If traditional cultivation methods are used, then device complexity is reduced, but loss of substance increases due to economic loss and wastage from pathogen damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedevice complexityVSAvoidloss of substance
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the source of contamination (the inner liner) as a separable, disposable component. By taking out the liner that直接接触 insects and making it disposable, the system prevents pathogen spread and material loss while adding minimal complexity to the overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS10448623B1Habitat and system for cultivation of insects
Publication Date: 2019.10.22 HALALI GROUP HOLDINGS LTD
  • US10448623B1 patent drawing
  • US10448623B1 patent drawing
  • US10448623B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An insert for use in an insect habitat. The insert usable to increase the overall surface space within a habitat available to cultivate the insects. The insert formed from including a plurality of members formed to mate or otherwise couple together to form a gird.