Insect Rearing Synchronization via Segmented Batch Sorting

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for large-scale insect rearing are inefficient and unsatisfactory in optimizing productivity, lacking a systematic approach to synchronize growth phases and manage rearing operations effectively.

Innovation Solution

A process and device that involve sorting and grouping insects by size or maturity into basic rearing units, allowing for synchronized rearing operations, automated management, and optimized logistics, including concentration/dilution sequences to maintain optimal insect density and health.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If insects are reared using traditional methods without systematic synchronization, then the rearing process is simpler to implement, but productivity and efficiency remain low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsect rearing productivityVSAvoidrearing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The rearing process is segmented into distinct growth phases and operational sequences. Insects are sorted by size or maturity into different containers, creating synchronized batches that progress through standardized stages. This segmentation allows for systematic management of large-scale rearing operations while maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Insects are sorted and grouped by size or maturity before entering the main rearing process. This preliminary synchronization action ensures that all insects in a batch are at similar developmental stages, enabling optimized feeding, monitoring, and harvesting schedules that significantly improve productivity without requiring overly complex continuous management systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Extent of automation

If manual rearing operations are used, then the process is easier to manage, but human error increases and automation is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation of rearing operationsVSAvoidoperational simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses automated sorting mechanisms that allow insects to be separated by size or maturity through mechanical means rather than manual intervention. Containers are automatically grouped into basic rearing units, and the system self-manages the synchronization process, reducing human error while maintaining operational simplicity through standardized procedures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Manual sorting and grouping operations are replaced with automated mechanical systems that sort insects by size or maturity and automatically assemble basic rearing units. This substitution increases automation extent while the standardized mechanical processes maintain ease of operation through consistency and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Manufacturing precision

If insects are reared without synchronization by size or maturity, then the rearing process is less complex, but product quality and homogeneity decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsect batch homogeneityVSAvoidsorting and grouping system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Insects are segmented into distinct batches based on size or maturity characteristics. This segmentation creates homogeneous groups that can be reared together, ensuring consistent development rates and product quality. The sorting system, while adding some complexity, enables precise control over batch composition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different containers or basic rearing units are assigned to insects with specific size or maturity characteristics. This local quality approach ensures that each batch receives optimized care tailored to its specific developmental stage, improving overall manufacturing precision and product homogeneity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Productivity

If large-scale rearing is implemented without optimized logistics, then production volume increases, but efficiency and resource utilization deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelarge-scale rearing efficiencyVSAvoidlogistics system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple containers are merged into basic rearing units that contain insects of the same category. This merging optimizes space utilization and resource distribution across large-scale operations. The standardized unit structure enables efficient logistics management while maintaining high productivity through coordinated care of synchronized batches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

Insects are preliminarily sorted and grouped into synchronized batches before being placed in basic rearing units. This preliminary organization simplifies subsequent logistics operations, as each unit requires standardized monitoring and care protocols, thereby improving large-scale rearing efficiency without requiring overly complex logistics systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11570972B2Process for rearing insects
Publication Date: 2023.02.07 YNSECT
  • US11570972B2 patent drawing
  • US11570972B2 patent drawing
  • US11570972B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for breeding insects, comprising growth phases during which the insects are stored in a controlled environment, said growth phases alternating with operating sequences during which at least one specific breeding operation is performed. The method comprises a sequence, referred to as synchronization sequence, during which a batch of insects is sorted and divided into a plurality of size or maturity categories in separate containers, then said containers (31, 32) are grouped together to form basic breeding units (UE) comprising a predefined number of containers (31, 32), a basic breeding unit (UE) comprising only insects of the same category.