Insect Spawning Container with Scalable Crevice Structure

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current insect breeding methods lack efficiency in scaling up insect production for human consumption, as they do not provide a reliable and scalable system for breeding insects like crawling mother beetles with protractable egg-laying tubes, such as lesser mealworms, which affects the number of harvested baby larvae and requires different conditions for spawning and hatching.

Innovation Solution

An insect breeding facility with stacked spawning containers and a spawn structure handling system that allows mother insects to spawn eggs in crevices within the containers, where the spawn structures are removable and transportable to a hatch area, enabling efficient harvesting of baby larvae, and includes a food delivery and container handling system for continuous operation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If insects are bred using traditional methods with non-removable spawn structures, then the breeding process is simpler, but the scalability and reliability of baby larvae output are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebaby larvae outputVSAvoidbreeding facility complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The breeding facility is divided into distinct functional modules: removable spawn structures within spawning containers, separate hatch areas, and automated handling systems. This segmentation allows independent optimization of each component and enables scalable configuration to meet different production requirements while maintaining reliable baby larvae output.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

An automated spawn structure handling system acts as an intermediary between spawning containers and hatch areas. This mediator automatically removes spawn structures from spawning containers and transports them to hatch areas, eliminating manual intervention and enabling continuous, reliable operation at scale.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Productivity

If spawn structures are made removable and transportable, then harvesting efficiency improves, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveharvesting efficiencyVSAvoidspawn structure handling system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The spawn structures are designed to be self-removable from spawning containers through simple mechanical interfaces. The structures can be easily detached and transported without requiring complex removal mechanisms, allowing the system to achieve high harvesting efficiency while keeping the handling system relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple identical spawn structures are used across numerous spawning containers. Once the handling system is designed for one structure type, it can be replicated and used throughout the entire facility, reducing overall system complexity through standardization while maintaining high harvesting efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Area of stationary object

If stacked spawning containers are used, then space utilization improves, but access for spawn structure removal becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespace utilizationVSAvoidspawn structure access
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The automated handling system serves as an intermediary that accesses spawn structures within stacked containers without requiring manual disassembly of the stacks. The system can reach into stacked configurations, remove spawn structures, and transport them to hatch areas, maintaining both high space utilization and operational ease.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of accessing spawn structures from the top or front of stacked containers, the handling system approaches containers from the side or bottom, utilizing horizontal or upward movement dimensions. This allows efficient access to stacked containers while maintaining compact vertical stacking arrangements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

4Measurement precision

If separate hatch areas are provided for each batch, then tracking and monitoring productivity improves, but the facility complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproductivity trackingVSAvoidhatch area configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The facility is divided into discrete hatch areas corresponding to different batches, with each area equipped with identification and monitoring capabilities. This segmentation enables precise tracking of productivity for each batch while allowing the overall system to be managed through standardized modular units, balancing measurement precision with manageable complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10595517B2Insect spawning container, facility and method for breeding insects
Publication Date: 2020.03.24 YNSECT NL R&D BV
  • US10595517B2 patent drawing
  • US10595517B2 patent drawing
  • US10595517B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to an insect spawning container in which at least one spawn structure is provided in which the mother insects will spawn their eggs. The spawn structure has a scalable face such that the mother beetles can crawl from the bottom onto and up along the scalable face of the spawn structure, the spawn structure comprising a multitude of crevices accessible from the scalable face, the crevices having dimensions tuned to the egg-laying tube of the mother beetles.