Automated Insect Trap Monitoring for Efficacy Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for evaluating the effectiveness of insect control chemicals often require human test subjects, exposing them to unnecessary risks and variables, and lack precision in measuring parameters such as the duration of effectiveness and species control.

Innovation Solution

The use of automated insect traps with monitors to assess the entry of insects into a test environment with and without insect control actives, allowing for comparison and estimation of the product's control over insect populations, thereby minimizing human exposure and providing detailed data on efficacy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If human test subjects are used to evaluate insect control products, then direct observation of insect behavior and protection effectiveness can be obtained, but human safety risks and ethical concerns increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedirect observation of insect behaviorVSAvoidhuman safety risks
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an automated monitoring system as an intermediary between the insect control product and the evaluation process. The system uses sensors, cameras, and automated tracking to observe insect behavior and measure protection effectiveness without requiring human subjects to be exposed to potential hazards.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a virtual model or simulation environment that replicates human-like conditions for insect testing. By using automated systems to track and analyze insect interactions with treated surfaces or air spaces, the system produces data equivalent to human subject testing without the associated safety risks.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Reliability

If human test subjects are used, then real-world effectiveness data can be collected, but the complexity of controlling variables such as body temperature, odor, and carbon dioxide emission increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereal-world effectiveness dataVSAvoidvariable control complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent systematically varies key parameters such as temperature, humidity, and chemical composition in controlled increments to study their individual effects on insect behavior. By changing one parameter at a time while holding others constant, the system isolates variables and reduces complexity while maintaining ecological relevance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The automated monitoring system is designed to simultaneously measure multiple variables including temperature, insect movement, and chemical concentration. This multi-functional approach allows comprehensive data collection without requiring separate experimental setups for each variable, thereby reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If human test subjects are required, then statistical assurance can be established, but the time and resources needed to recruit and manage sufficient subjects increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestatistical assuranceVSAvoidsubject recruitment and management time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The automated system performs self-data collection and self-analysis, eliminating the need for human subject recruitment, training, and management. The system automatically conducts repeated trials, collects behavioral data, and generates statistical results, thereby maintaining statistical assurance while eliminating time losses associated with human subject logistics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The automated monitoring system operates continuously without interruption, conducting multiple trials and collecting data around the clock if needed. This continuous operation eliminates the scheduling constraints and downtime associated with human subject availability, thereby reducing total testing time while maintaining or improving statistical power through increased sample sizes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enables precise evaluation of insect control products without human exposure, allowing for the determination of protection duration and species control, optimizing product development and use.

Implementation Method 1

The insect trap has an automated monitor for automatically monitoring and reporting the entry of insects into the trap

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAutomated monitoring:

Data Source

PatentUS7921594B2Methods for testing insect control products
Publication Date: 2011.04.12 SC JOHNSON & SON INC
  • US7921594B2 patent drawing
  • US7921594B2 patent drawing
  • US7921594B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods determine how effective a product that dispenses an insect repellent or insecticide is in controlling flying insects such as mosquitoes, with no or reduced need for human test subjects. An insect trap or other automated monitoring device is positioned in a test environment and operated in a manner so as to mimic some human attribute (e.g. by dispensing carbon dioxide). Trap/monitoring results in the presence and absence of the operating product are obtained in order to judge relative effectiveness of the active. Further, the real time evaluation of insect populations permits evaluation of time needed to achieve base effectiveness and length of time that effectiveness can be sustained.