Insert-Assisted Solid-Phase Bonding for Dissimilar Metal Joints

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current dissimilar material solid phase bonding methods often result in fragile intermetallic compounds at the bonded interface and difficulty in achieving strong joints, especially when bonding steel materials with different compositions, due to differing deformation behaviors and physical properties.

Innovation Solution

A dissimilar material solid phase bonding method that uses an insert material to control bonding temperatures by applying different pressures at distinct interfaces, allowing for efficient bonding of metals with different compositions by forming new surfaces through frictional and electrical heating, while suppressing intermetallic compound formation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional friction welding is used for dissimilar materials, then bonding can be achieved, but fragile intermetallic compounds form at the bonded interface

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebond strengthVSAvoidintermetallic compound formation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

A third material (insert) is introduced between the dissimilar materials to be bonded. This insert material has intermediate properties that are compatible with both base materials, preventing direct contact between incompatible materials and thus suppressing intermetallic compound formation while still enabling strong bonding through controlled plastic deformation at both interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If solid phase bonding is used to avoid intermetallic compounds, then bonding temperature can be controlled, but deformation behavior differences between dissimilar materials make good joints difficult to obtain

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebond qualityVSAvoidcompatibility with different material compositions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The insert material serves as a mediator that adapts to both dissimilar base materials. By selecting an insert with appropriate mechanical properties intermediate between the two base materials, the system achieves compatibility with different material compositions while maintaining controlled solid phase bonding conditions that prevent intermetallic formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention controls bonding parameters (temperature, pressure, deformation rate) to match the specific deformation behaviors of each material pair. By adjusting these parameters based on the properties of the base materials and insert, good joints can be obtained across different dissimilar material combinations while maintaining solid phase bonding advantages.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If different pressures are applied at different interfaces, then bonding temperature can be accurately controlled for each material pair, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebonding temperature controlVSAvoidpressure application mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The bonding process is segmented into two independent interface bonding operations. Each interface (between insert and first material, between insert and second material) can have independently controlled bonding parameters including pressure and temperature. This segmentation enables precise control of bonding temperature for each material pair while allowing the device to handle different material combinations flexibly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enables the formation of strong, high-strength bonded portions with reduced intermetallic compound thickness, ensuring excellent mechanical properties and reliability in dissimilar material joints.

Implementation Method 1

the temperature of the bonded interfaces is raised by frictional heat due to sliding between the insert material and the materials to be bonded

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFrictional heat: Friction

Implementation Method 2

the temperature of the bonded interfaces is raised by frictional heat due to sliding between the insert material and the materials to be bonded, and/or by electrical heating

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrical heating: Joule Heating

Data Source

PatentUS11872651B2Dissimilar material solid phase bonding method, dissimilar material solid phase bonded structure, and dissimilar material solid phase bonding device
Publication Date: 2024.01.16 OSAKA UNIVERSITY
  • US11872651B2 patent drawing
  • US11872651B2 patent drawing
  • US11872651B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A dissimilar material solid phase bonding method is disclosed wherein one member and another member having different compositions are brought into contact with one another by way of an insert material to form an interface (1) to be bonded, at which the one member and the insert material are in contact with one another, and an interface (2) to be bonded, at which the other member and the insert material are in contact with one another; the temperature of the interface (1) to be bonded and the interface (2) to be bonded is raised by means of frictional heat and/or by electrical heating; a bonding pressure (1) is applied substantially perpendicular to the interface (1) to be bonded; a bonding pressure (2) is applied substantially perpendicular to the interface (2) to be bonded; and the bonding pressure (1) and the bonding pressure (2) are set to different values.