Insider Threat Detection via Dynamic Behavioral Profiling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods are inadequate in detecting insider threats, particularly those involving authorized network entities accessing sensitive information for unauthorized purposes, as they rely on static signatures and background patterns that fail to detect anomalies in variable network traffic.

Innovation Solution

A system that dynamically learns baseline behavioral profiles of network traffic to identify systematic deviations, using feature vectors and anomaly detection algorithms to flag potential insider threats through real-time analysis and machine learning.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If predetermined rules with detectable signatures are used to detect insider threats, then known methods of misuse can be identified, but new or unknown methods of misuse cannot be detected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracy for known threatsVSAvoidability to detect new or unknown threats
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from static predetermined rules to dynamic machine learning models that continuously learn and adapt to new insider threat patterns. The behavioral profiles are updated over time to detect both known and emerging threat methods without requiring manual rule updates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the detection parameters from fixed signatures to variable behavioral metrics such as data access frequency, transfer volumes, and temporal patterns. These parameters are dynamically adjusted based on learned baseline behaviors, enabling detection of both known and unknown threat methods.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Ease of manufacture

If static signatures and background patterns are used for detection, then implementation is simple, but detection capability against variable network traffic is inadequate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesimplicity of implementationVSAvoiddetection effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service through automated machine learning that continuously trains on network traffic data without manual intervention. The behavioral profiles automatically adapt to changing network conditions and threat patterns, maintaining both simplicity of deployment and high detection reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback loops where detection results and new network traffic continuously refine the behavioral profiles. This feedback mechanism enables the system to maintain simplicity while improving detection effectiveness over time through automatic learning from observed patterns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If real-time analysis with machine learning is implemented, then detection of insider threats is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinsider threat detection capabilityVSAvoidsystem architecture complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex detection task into distinct components: baseline behavioral profile creation, anomaly detection algorithms, and threat classification modules. This segmentation manages complexity by organizing functions into separate, manageable units that can be independently optimized and maintained.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces intermediary behavioral profiles that mediate between raw network traffic and final threat detection. These profiles serve as an intermediate representation that simplifies the complexity of analyzing raw traffic while maintaining high detection capability through structured behavioral metrics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Adaptability or versatility

If behavioral profiles are dynamically learned from network traffic, then detection adapts to changing patterns, but computational resources are consumed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptation to changing traffic patternsVSAvoidcomputational energy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs periodic action by updating behavioral profiles at optimized intervals rather than continuously processing every network event. This periodic updating maintains adaptability to changing patterns while significantly reducing computational energy consumption compared to continuous real-time analysis of all traffic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Data Source

PatentUS9609010B2System and method for detecting insider threats
Publication Date: 2017.03.28 PERSONAM
  • US9609010B2 patent drawing
  • US9609010B2 patent drawing
  • US9609010B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An approach for detecting an insider threat is described. Embodiments include determining one or more features from one or more network transfers among a plurality of network entities, determining a baseline behavioral profile of the plurality of network entities based on the one or more features; and determining at least one malicious network entity from among the plurality of network entities based on a systematic deviation from the baseline behavioral profile of at least one of the one or more features.