Insight Generation System for Data Repository Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing data repository systems struggle to effectively analyze and display insights to users, as they often limit the type and quantity of analyses presented, making relevant interpretations and analyses not apparent, and their relevance varies by user and context.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for generating and displaying insights using repository data, which involves receiving user requests, creating analyses based on attributes, selecting insights, generating recommended actions, and recursively performing further analyses and insights based on user instructions, utilizing machine learning models to choose attributes and prioritize actions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Quantity of substance

If multiple analyses and interpretations are generated from repository data, then the quantity and variety of information available to users increases, but the complexity of the system and difficulty of presenting relevant information increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantity of analyses and interpretationsVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the large set of generated analyses and interpretations by organizing them into hierarchical categories and groups based on relevance, type, and user context. This segmentation allows the system to manage complex information by breaking it down into manageable, organized portions that can be selectively presented to users without overwhelming system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes parameters such as the number of analyses displayed, the depth of interpretation, and the level of detail based on user preferences, context, and system state. By adjusting these parameters, the system can adapt the quantity and complexity of presented information to match user needs, resolving the contradiction between providing comprehensive analyses and maintaining manageable system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If comprehensive data analyses are generated, then the relevance and value of information to users improves, but the time and computational resources required increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverelevance of informationVSAvoidtime for analysis and display
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and pre-organizing repository data into structured formats, pre-generating potential analyses and interpretations, and pre-establishing relevance criteria based on user profiles and context. This preliminary preparation reduces the time required for real-time analysis while maintaining high relevance, as the system only needs to select and present from pre-computed options rather than generating everything from scratch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial action by generating and presenting only the most relevant subset of analyses and interpretations rather than all possible analyses. By using relevance scoring, filtering, and selective presentation, the system provides sufficient information value to users without incurring the computational cost and time expenditure of generating every possible analysis, thus resolving the contradiction between comprehensiveness and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system adapts analyses to individual user needs and contexts, then the relevance of information to each user improves, but the complexity of personalization and customization increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to user needsVSAvoidpersonalization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements universality by creating a standardized framework for personalization that can serve multiple users with different needs and contexts. Rather than building separate customization systems for each user, the system uses a universal set of parameters, filters, and adaptation rules that can be configured once and applied across all users, reducing the overall complexity while maintaining high adaptability to individual needs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback mechanisms to adapt to user needs by monitoring user interactions, preferences, and context information, then adjusting the generation and presentation of analyses accordingly. This feedback-driven adaptation allows the system to become increasingly personalized over time without requiring complex manual configuration, as the system automatically learns and adjusts based on user responses, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11989174B2Systems and methods for data insight generation and display
Publication Date: 2024.05.21 STRATEGY INC
  • US11989174B2 patent drawing
  • US11989174B2 patent drawing
  • US11989174B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed herein are systems and methods for intelligent generation and display of insights using information in a data repository. For example, disclosed herein are methods for generating and displaying insights using initial data from a data repository, and intelligently/automatically proposing, generating, and displaying further insights using previously-generated insights.