Inspection Level Setting System for Aligning Device Criteria with User Determination
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Inspection devices often incorrectly classify output materials as either good or defective due to overly strict or loose inspection levels, leading to mismatches between user determination and device assessment.
Innovation Solution
An inspection level setting system that adjusts the inspection level based on user input, where the management server displays inspection results and receives user determination, changing the inspection level to align with the user's criterion when there is a mismatch, thereby refining the determination criterion.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Reliability
If the inspection level is set strictly, then the inspection device can identify more defective products, but it incorrectly classifies good products as defective
Solution Approach 1:
The system displays inspection results to the user and receives feedback on whether each inspected output material is actually good or defective. This feedback is used to iteratively adjust the inspection level, creating a closed-loop system that learns from user corrections to improve classification accuracy over time.
Solution Approach 2:
The inspection level is treated as an adjustable parameter that can be dynamically changed based on user feedback. The system modifies the inspection level parameter to bring it closer to the user's determination criterion, resolving the contradiction between strict and loose inspection by making the parameter adaptive rather than fixed.
2Measurement precision
If the inspection level is set loosely, then the inspection device accepts more good products, but it incorrectly classifies defective products as good
Solution Approach 1:
The system receives user feedback on misclassified defective products and uses this information to adjust the inspection level. When users correct misclassifications, the system learns to tighten the inspection criteria appropriately, maintaining high good product acceptance while improving defective product rejection.
Solution Approach 2:
The inspection level is made dynamic rather than static. The system adapts the inspection level based on accumulated user feedback, allowing it to respond to the specific characteristics of different output materials and user requirements, thereby resolving the contradiction between acceptance and rejection accuracy.
3Ease of operation
If the inspection level is fixed, then the device operation is simple, but it cannot adapt to user determination criteria
Solution Approach 1:
The system performs self-adjustment of the inspection level based on user feedback without requiring manual reconfiguration. The automatic adjustment mechanism allows the device to adapt to user criteria while maintaining operational simplicity, as users only need to provide feedback rather than manually tune parameters.
Solution Approach 2:
The system prepares for adaptation by collecting and processing user feedback in advance. By accumulating feedback data and performing preliminary analysis, the system can make informed adjustments to the inspection level, balancing operational simplicity with adaptability to user criteria.
Data Source
AI summary
An inspection level setting system includes a processor configured to display an inspection result of inspecting whether an output material output from an output apparatus is a good product in an inspection device in which an inspection level serving as a reference for determining whether the output material is the good product is set, receive, from a user, an input of a determination result as to whether the output material inspected by the inspection device is the good product, and change, in a case where the inspection result by the inspection device does not match the determination result of the user, the inspection level set in the inspection device to be brought close to a determination criterion of the user.


