Surgical Robot Instrument Memory for Software Compatibility Checking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Surgical robotic systems face challenges in tracking compatibility between different hardware iterations of surgical instruments and their corresponding software controllers, leading to issues such as improper closure of blades due to incompatibility and the need for modified torque targets.

Innovation Solution

A surgical robotic system with an instrument memory storing a list of compatible software modules and a main memory containing software instructions, along with a controller that communicates with the instrument memory to determine compatibility and select the appropriate software module for controlling the surgical instrument.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If hardware iterations of surgical instruments are updated, then instrument functionality is improved, but compatibility with existing software controllers deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstrument functionalityVSAvoidsoftware-hardware compatibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The instrument stores a list of compatible software module identifiers in its memory before hardware changes occur. This pre-stored compatibility information enables the controller to proactively select the correct software module when the instrument is coupled, preventing compatibility issues before they arise.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system establishes a feedback loop where the controller reads the compatible software module list from the instrument memory, compares it with available software modules in the system, and selects the matching one. This feedback mechanism ensures that software and hardware remain synchronized across iterations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Manufacturing precision

If torque targets are modified for new hardware versions, then instrument performance is optimized, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveinstrument performanceVSAvoidsoftware configuration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of manually configuring torque targets for each hardware version, the system changes the approach by storing optimized parameters within the software modules themselves. Each software module contains the specific torque targets and control parameters needed for its corresponding hardware version, eliminating the need for complex manual configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates copies of software modules for different hardware versions, with each copy containing the specific parameters optimized for its target hardware. This allows the system to maintain multiple versions without increasing operational complexity, as the correct version is automatically selected based on hardware identification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Measurement precision

If compatibility checking is performed manually, then accuracy is improved, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecompatibility detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem setup time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The instrument performs self-identification by providing its own hardware identifier and compatible software module list through its memory. This self-service approach eliminates the need for manual compatibility checking by the user, as the system automatically determines compatibility by reading the instrument's stored information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical process of compatibility checking is replaced with an automated electronic system. The controller electronically reads the instrument's memory, compares software module identifiers with available modules, and automatically selects the compatible one, replacing manual verification with automated digital comparison.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS12548667B2System and method for checking compatibility of hardware and software components in a surgical robot
Publication Date: 2026.02.10 COVIDIEN LP
  • US12548667B2 patent drawing
  • US12548667B2 patent drawing
  • US12548667B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A surgical robotic system includes a surgical instrument having an instrument memory storing a list having a plurality of identifiers, each of which identifies a compatible software module. The system also includes a main memory having a plurality of stored software modules, each of which includes instructions for controlling a particular type of surgical instruments. The system further includes a controller configured to communicate with the instrument memory and to determine whether at least one of the stored software modules matches at least one of the compatible software modules.