Instrument Panel Beam Structure for High Rigidity at Lower Mass
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Instrument panel beams require high torsional and flexural rigidity to enhance vehicle stability and occupant protection during collisions, but increasing wall thickness to achieve this results in increased mass, which is undesirable.
Innovation Solution
An instrument panel beam assembly comprising a large-diameter and small-diameter hollow tube joined axially, with alternating flat plates and curved bends, and a pair of brackets to fit the tubes, allowing for reduced thickness while maintaining rigidity, and thus minimizing mass.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Strength
If the wall thickness of the instrument panel beam is increased to increase flexural rigidity and torsional rigidity, then the rigidity is improved, but the mass of the instrument panel beam is increased
Solution Approach 1:
The instrument panel beam is divided into multiple sections along its length, with each section having different cross-sectional shapes (circular, oval, flat). This segmentation allows optimization of rigidity in different regions without uniformly increasing wall thickness throughout the entire beam, thereby maintaining low mass while achieving required rigidity levels.
Solution Approach 2:
Different sections of the instrument panel beam are given different cross-sectional qualities tailored to their specific functional requirements. The circular section provides torsional rigidity, the oval section provides flexural rigidity, and the flat section provides both. This local quality optimization allows the beam to achieve high overall rigidity without increasing wall thickness uniformly, thus avoiding mass increase.
2Ease of manufacture
If the instrument panel beam is formed with a cylindrical shape, then the manufacturing is simplified, but the flexural rigidity and torsional rigidity cannot be increased without increasing wall thickness
Solution Approach 1:
The beam is segmented into multiple sections with different cross-sectional shapes that can be produced through sequential drawing operations. Each section's shape is optimized for its specific rigidity requirements while remaining manufacturable through standard drawing processes, thus maintaining ease of manufacture while achieving high rigidity.
Solution Approach 2:
The cross-sectional shape parameters (circular, oval, flat) are changed along the length of the beam to optimize rigidity characteristics. These parameter changes are achieved through drawing processing with different dies, maintaining manufacturing simplicity while significantly improving flexural and torsional rigidity without increasing wall thickness.
Data Source
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3~4
AI summary
An instrument panel beam (110) is the instrument panel beam (110) that is arranged in the width direction of tan automobile, and includes: a large-diameter hollow tube (200) having a hollow cylindrical shape; and a small-diameter hollow tube (300) which is joined to the large-diameter hollow tube (200) in an axial direction, has a diameter that is smaller than that of the large-diameter hollow tube (200), and has a hollow cylindrical shape. The small-diameter hollow tube (300) includes two flat plates that extend in a longitudinal direction and two bends that are curved in a circumferential direction, and the flat plates and the bends are alternately arranged in the circumferential direction.