Instrument Panel Chute and Door Mechanism for Airbag Deployment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional airbag deployment systems in vehicles often result in foam fragmentation and inconsistent opening of the instrument panel during airbag inflation, limiting the size of the airbag and deployment speed.

Innovation Solution

A foam-in-place instrument panel design featuring a housing with a chute and door mechanism, including S-shaped hinges and ridges, allows for bottom-up installation of a larger airbag, concentrating inflation force and reducing foam fragmentation, with a substrate and foam layer configuration that enhances consistent opening and scoring techniques.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional airbag deployment systems are used, then airbags can be deployed, but foam fragmentation and inconsistent opening of the instrument panel occur, limiting airbag size and deployment speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment speedVSAvoidpanel opening consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The instrument panel is segmented into a housing with a chute and a separate door that can open independently. The airbag is contained within the chute during deployment, allowing the door to open consistently while the airbag expands through the chute opening, preventing foam fragmentation and improving deployment consistency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The chute acts as an intermediary structure between the airbag and the instrument panel exterior. It channels the expanding airbag in a controlled manner, concentrating inflation force and guiding the deployment path to prevent inconsistent panel opening and foam damage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Volume of moving object

If larger airbags are installed, then better occupant protection is achieved, but foam fragmentation and panel damage increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveairbag sizeVSAvoidfoam fragmentation
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The housing is divided into a chute portion and a door portion, allowing the airbag to expand within the chute while the door opens separately. This segmentation contains the inflation force within defined boundaries, preventing foam fragmentation even with larger airbag volumes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The chute provides a localized controlled expansion path for the airbag, concentrating the inflation force in a specific direction toward the door. This localized force concentration prevents diffuse foam fragmentation and allows larger airbags to deploy without damaging the instrument panel

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Reliability

If the airbag is contained within a housing with chute and door, then deployment consistency improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedeployment consistencyVSAvoidhousing structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The chute and door are merged into a single integrated housing structure that is formed as one piece. This merging reduces the number of separate components and assembly steps while maintaining the functional benefits of having both a chute for airbag containment and a door for controlled opening

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The housing structure serves multiple functions simultaneously: it contains the airbag during deployment, provides a chute for controlled expansion, incorporates a hinge mechanism for door opening, and acts as the instrument panel cover. This multi-functionality reduces overall system complexity despite the enhanced deployment consistency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design enables quicker and cleaner airbag deployment, reducing foam fragmentation, improving panel opening consistency, and allowing for larger airbag sizes while minimizing damage to the instrument panel.

Implementation Method 1

The housing may include a hinge connecting the door and the chute and elongated along the perimeter of the end of the chute

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHinge mechanism: Hinge

Data Source

PatentUS10752197B2Instrument panel with passenger airbag
Publication Date: 2020.08.25 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US10752197B2 patent drawing
  • US10752197B2 patent drawing
  • US10752197B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An instrument panel includes a housing and an airbag. The housing includes a chute elongated to an end and a door at least partially covering the end of the chute. The airbag is disposed in the chute. The housing includes a first ridge elongated along a perimeter of the end of the chute and a second ridge elongated along a perimeter of the door.