Real-time Instrumentation Configuration for Emergency Response

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current remote sensing technologies for oil spill detection are not optimized for dynamic environmental conditions and require extensive time to assess and deploy, making real-time detection and response challenging due to the variety of spill sizes and types, and evolving physical and chemical characteristics.

Innovation Solution

A methodology and computer-based system that configures instrumentation based on performance and suitability scores, using real-time data to select the most appropriate sensors for emergency response scenarios, considering factors like availability, deployment requirements, and environmental conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If traditional published reviews are used to assess remote sensing technologies, then comprehensive information on available technologies is provided, but considerable time is required to read and digest the information

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomprehensive information on remote sensing technologiesVSAvoidtime to read and digest information
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of reading and digesting published reviews with an automated computer-based system that electronically processes instrument profiles, applies criteria automatically, and generates rankings. This substitution of automated information processing for manual review dramatically reduces the time required while maintaining comprehensive assessment of remote sensing technologies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service by automatically performing the assessment and ranking of instruments without requiring human experts to manually review published materials. The computer-based system independently evaluates instrument profiles against predefined criteria and generates actionable recommendations, freeing responders from time-consuming manual information processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If remote sensing technologies are optimized for specific environmental conditions, then detection performance is improved, but the system becomes less adaptable to varying spill scenarios and conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection performanceVSAvoidadaptability to varying spill scenarios
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic assessment system where instrument rankings are not fixed but are recalculated based on current environmental conditions, spill characteristics, and scenario parameters. The system adapts to varying conditions by automatically updating the evaluation of each instrument profile against the current situation, allowing optimal instrument selection for each specific spill scenario while maintaining the ability to handle diverse conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes parameters by adjusting the weight and relevance of different instrument characteristics based on the specific spill scenario and environmental conditions. Different instrument profiles are evaluated with varying criteria weights depending on whether the scenario involves chemical spills, biological spills, aerial detection, or surface water monitoring, thereby optimizing detection performance for each condition while maintaining overall versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive criteria are applied to evaluate each instrument profile, then assessment accuracy is improved, but the complexity of the evaluation process increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassessment accuracyVSAvoidcomplexity of evaluation process
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex manual evaluation processes with automated computer-based processing. The system automatically applies comprehensive criteria to each instrument profile, performs calculations, and generates rankings without requiring human experts to manually assess each parameter. This automation maintains high assessment accuracy through systematic application of multiple criteria while reducing the perceived and actual complexity of the evaluation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The evaluation process is segmented into distinct modular components: instrument profile data, criteria definitions, scenario parameters, and ranking algorithms. Each criterion is independently defined and applied, allowing the complex evaluation to be broken down into manageable segments that can be processed systematically by the computer system, reducing overall process complexity while maintaining comprehensiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10807133B2Real-time configuration of instrumentation
Publication Date: 2020.10.20 THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY
  • US10807133B2 patent drawing
  • US10807133B2 patent drawing
  • US10807133B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments relate to instrumentation configuration for emergency response. Initially, instrument profiles are obtained from an instrument data source, where each instrument profile corresponds to an instrument for emergency response. Criteria are applied to each of the instrument profiles to determine performance scores for the instruments. Scenario sensors are used to collect real-time measurements at a geographic location of an emergency. At this stage, scenario parameters comprising the real-time measurements are obtained from a scenario data source. Each instrument profile is evaluated based on the scenario parameters to determine a suitability index. The performance score and the suitability index of each instrument profile is combined to determine an instrument rating. An instrument subset is selected from the instruments based on the instrument ratings. An instrumentation configuration for the instrument subset is generated, where the instrumentation configuration is used to deploy at least one instrument on a response vehicle or instrument platform.