Insufflator Auto-Preadjustment Using Patient and Procedure Data

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing medical devices, particularly insufflators, lack the capability to automatically preadjust treatment parameters based on patient-specific and procedure-specific data, leading to inefficiencies and potential mismatches in equipment settings.

Innovation Solution

A medical system that integrates interfaces for reading patient and procedure information, memory units for data storage, and a computing unit to determine and adjust insufflator parameters, ensuring compatibility and safety through automated parameter setting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual parameter adjustment is used for insufflator setup, then device complexity is reduced, but productivity decreases due to time-consuming setup procedures

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesetup speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by automatically retrieving patient data from the HIS before the insufflator is even activated. Patient information, procedure details, and pre-calculated operating parameters are fetched and stored in memory units in advance, eliminating the need for manual setup during the surgical procedure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The insufflator system serves itself by automatically adjusting its operating parameters based on patient data without requiring manual intervention. The computing unit processes patient information and autonomously determines optimal settings for flow rate, pressure limits, and volume targets, making the device self-configuring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If automated parameter preadjustment is implemented, then productivity increases through faster setup, but device complexity increases due to additional interfaces and computing units

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidsystem architecture
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The insufflator is designed with multi-functionality by integrating multiple interfaces (HIS interface, image recognition system) and capabilities (data retrieval, automatic parameter calculation, display) into a single device. This universal design allows the insufflator to perform both traditional insufflation functions and automated parameter preadjustment functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

Memory units serve as intermediaries between the HIS interface and the insufflator's control system. Patient data and operating parameters are stored in memory units that act as buffers, allowing the computing unit to process information at its own pace without real-time connection to the HIS, thus simplifying the overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If standard parameter settings are used for all patients, then device complexity is minimized, but reliability decreases due to patient-specific mismatches

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter accuracyVSAvoiddata processing capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies local quality by tailoring operating parameters to each individual patient's characteristics. Instead of using uniform settings for all patients, the computing unit calculates specific parameters based on patient-specific data such as age, weight, height, BMI, and procedure type, ensuring optimal and safe settings for each case.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes operating parameters based on patient data. The computing unit adjusts flow rate, pressure limits, and volume targets according to patient-specific factors retrieved from the HIS, transforming static standard parameters into dynamic patient-adapted parameters that improve safety and effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Loss of time

If manual data entry is required for patient information, then device complexity is reduced, but loss of time increases during setup

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesetup timeVSAvoidinterface requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The manual mechanical process of data entry is replaced with automated electronic data retrieval. The HIS interface automatically queries and retrieves patient information from the hospital's database system, eliminating the need for operators to manually type or input patient data, thus saving significant setup time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

Patient data is copied from the HIS database to the insufflator's memory units rather than being re-entered. The system creates a digital copy of relevant patient information including demographics, procedure details, and clinical parameters, allowing rapid transfer and processing without manual intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS12562270B2Medical insufflator with automatic preadjustment of operating parameters
Publication Date: 2026.02.24 WOM WORLD OF MEDICINE GMBH

AI summary

The invention relates to a device for using individual data from networked medical devices for a simple and safe patient-specific equipment setting of an insufflator.