Multilayer Insulation Panel with Expansive Graphite Fire Barrier

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing multilayer insulation panels for construction rely on metallic backing layers for fire-resistant properties, which are costly and not universally applicable, and there is a need for an alternative that maintains similar fire-resistance performance.

Innovation Solution

A multilayer insulation panel with a polyurethane foam core sandwiched between backing layers, one of which includes a reinforcement layer of fibrous material and a fire-resistant layer made from expansive graphite, which expands to create a barrier against flames, combined with a cladding layer containing flame retardants and refractory agents, and a binding layer using sodium silicates to secure the graphite.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If metallic backing layers are used to achieve fire-resistant properties, then fire resistance performance is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire resistance performanceVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the material parameters from metallic to non-metallic (graphite and sodium silicate) while maintaining fire-resistant properties. The graphite content is controlled at 30-70 wt% and sodium silicate at 10-40 wt% to achieve optimal fire resistance without using expensive metals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces expensive metallic backing layers with cheaper non-metallic materials (graphite and sodium silicate) that can provide equivalent fire-resistant performance. This substitution significantly reduces manufacturing costs while maintaining the required reliability for construction insulation panels.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

2Ease of manufacture

If non-metallic backing layers are used to reduce cost, then manufacturing cost decreases, but fire-resistant performance deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidfire resistance performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention creates a composite backing layer combining graphite (30-70 wt%) and sodium silicate (10-40 wt%) with the polyurethane foam core. This composite structure leverages the fire-resistant properties of both materials to achieve class B fire resistance, matching or exceeding metallic alternatives while reducing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Solution Approach 2:

The invention optimizes the compositional parameters of the backing layer by controlling the specific ratios of graphite and sodium silicate. This parameter optimization ensures that the non-metallic composite achieves fire-resistant performance equivalent to metallic layers, resolving the contradiction between cost and performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If expansive graphite is added to the backing layer, then fire-resistant barrier properties are improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefire-resistant barrier propertiesVSAvoidbacking layer structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the fire-resistant functions of multiple materials (graphite, sodium silicate, and polyurethane foam) into a single integrated backing layer. This unified structure eliminates the need for separate metallic layers while maintaining equivalent fire protection, thereby reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The panel achieves high fire-resistant performance, classified in class B according to EN 13501-11925/2 standards, with the expansive graphite and sodium silicate layers providing effective barriers against flames, and the cladding layer enhancing thermal insulation and mechanical stability.

Implementation Method 1

a fire-resistant layer made from expansive graphite, which expands to create a barrier against flames

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Implementation Method 2

a binding layer using sodium silicates to secure the graphite

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAdhesion: Adhesive

Implementation Method 3

a cladding layer containing flame retardants and refractory agents, and a binding layer using sodium silicates to secure the graphite

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal insulation: Thermal Insulation

Implementation Method 4

The panel achieves high fire-resistant performance, classified in class B according to EN 13501-11925/2 standards

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFire resistance: Refractory Material

Data Source

PatentUS11701859B2Insulation panel for construction and manufacturing method thereof
Publication Date: 2023.07.18 SILCART SPA
  • US11701859B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A multilayer thermal insulation panel for construction and manufacturing method thereof are described. A manufacturing method of a backing layer of a multilayer thermal insulation panel for construction, the method comprising the steps of: providing a reinforcement layer in fibrous material, spreading a first fluid mineral mixture on the reinforcement layer to form a cladding layer of the reinforcement layer; forming a fire-resistant layer comprising expansive graphite on the cladding layer; and drying the backing layer.