Insulin Delivery Modeling for Fasting and Postprandial Periods

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing insulin infusion devices struggle to accurately calculate and administer insulin boluses to maintain blood glucose levels within the desired range, particularly during fasting and postprandial periods, due to variations in user behavior and glucose responses.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for identifying fasting and postprandial periods based on detected events, using a mathematical model trained with therapy-related data and event detection to adapt insulin delivery strategies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a single mathematical model is used for insulin delivery, then the device complexity is reduced, but the accuracy of insulin dosing during different periods (fasting vs. postprandial) deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel complexityVSAvoidinsulin dosing accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the insulin delivery control into separate mathematical models for different periods: a first mathematical model for fasting periods and a second mathematical model for postprandial periods. This segmentation allows each model to be optimized for its specific period, improving dosing accuracy without requiring a single overly complex model to handle all scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically switches between different mathematical models based on the detected period (fasting or postprandial). The insulin delivery strategy adapts in real-time by selecting the appropriate model, allowing the system to maintain high accuracy across varying conditions without permanently increasing structural complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If period identification based on detected events is implemented, then the adaptability to user behavior is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebehavior adaptationVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically detects events (such as meal intake, exercise, sleep) and uses these detected events to identify fasting and postprandial periods without requiring manual user input. This self-service approach improves adaptability to user behavior while minimizing the complexity burden on the user, as the system performs the detection and classification autonomously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses detected events as feedback to continuously refine period identification and adjust insulin delivery strategies. By incorporating event detection feedback loops, the system adapts to user behavior patterns while maintaining a manageable complexity level through iterative learning rather than requiring complex pre-programming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12573486B2Method and system for identifying fasting and postprandial periods based on detected events and using the same to train a mathematical model
Publication Date: 2026.03.10 MEDTRONIC MINIMED INC
  • US12573486B2 patent drawing
  • US12573486B2 patent drawing
  • US12573486B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Technologies are provided for identifying fasting and postprandial periods based on detected events and using the same to train a mathematical model. Events during a period can be detected via an event detection system. Each detected event can include a specific activity that is indicative of a physical behavior of the user. Training data and the detected events can be processed to determine timing of fasting periods, timing of postprandial periods, and timing of other periods. Training data from the fasting periods and other training data from the postprandial periods can be identified. The mathematical model of the user can be trained to identify fasting parameters of a physiological blood glucose response of the user during the fasting periods, and fasting parameters of a physiological blood glucose response of the user (differently) during postprandial periods.