Automated Insurance Claim Assignment System

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Insurance companies face inefficiencies in manually assigning insurance claims, leading to increased handling time, inappropriate resource allocation, and higher costs due to bottlenecks, skill mismatches, and difficulty in managing workload and expertise across geographically dispersed teams.

Innovation Solution

An automated assignment system that systematically assigns insurable events to the most suitable organizational entities based on properties like jurisdiction, complexity, and availability, utilizing a rules engine and pattern analyzer to optimize resource allocation and load balancing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If manual assignment process is used by managers, then flexibility in handling complex claims is maintained, but handling time increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclaim handling throughputVSAvoidclaim handling time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments claims into different complexity categories (simple, moderate, complex) and routes them to appropriate handlers automatically. This segmentation allows high-volume simple claims to be processed quickly by less experienced handlers while complex claims receive specialized attention, thereby increasing overall throughput without sacrificing quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary analysis of claims upon receipt, automatically categorizing them by complexity and assigning them to appropriate handlers before human intervention is needed. This preliminary action eliminates the manual triage step that previously consumed manager time and delayed claim processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If manual assignment by managers is used, then skill matching can be performed, but bottlenecks occur and handling time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveskill-appropriate assignment accuracyVSAvoidassignment processing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces the mechanical manual review process with an automated electronic classification system that uses predefined criteria and algorithms to match claims with appropriate handlers. This substitution maintains skill-matching accuracy while eliminating the time-consuming manual review bottleneck.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses multiple parameters (claim complexity, handler expertise level, current workload, geographic location) to automatically determine optimal assignments. By changing from a single-parameter manual judgment process to a multi-parameter automated system, both accuracy and speed of assignment are improved.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If managers manually track availability and workload, then optimal resource allocation can be attempted, but difficulty in managing geographically dispersed teams creates inefficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresource allocation efficiencyVSAvoidworkload management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system creates a universal platform that automatically tracks and manages handler availability, expertise, and workload across all geographic locations. This single system performs multiple functions (tracking, matching, assigning, balancing) that previously required separate manual efforts by managers, thereby improving resource allocation without increasing management complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors handler workload and availability in real-time, providing automatic feedback that enables dynamic load balancing. When a handler becomes overloaded or unavailable, the system automatically reassigns claims to maintain optimal resource utilization across the entire organization, regardless of geographic distribution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8126742B2Automated assignment of insurable events
Publication Date: 2012.02.28 DUCK CREEK TECH LTD
  • US8126742B2 patent drawing
  • US8126742B2 patent drawing
  • US8126742B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An automated assignment system may operate with a computer to automatically assign insurable events to one or more organizational entities associated with an insurance organization. The automated assignment system may categorize the insurable event. In addition, the automated assignment system may identify at least one target organizational entity based on the categorization that is capable of handling the insurable event. Identification of the target organizational entity or entities may be a function of properties associated with the insurable event and the availability of the organizational entity or entities. Automatic assignment may also be a function of the current workload of the target organizational entity or entities.