Insurance Coverage Modeler for Policy Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Consumers often lack awareness of their insurance coverage levels, leading to underinsurance or overinsurance due to challenges in determining optimal coverage and interpreting claim information, even for professionals in the insurance industry.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for modeling insurance coverage using a claim scenario generator that allows users to select and modify coverage parameters graphically, adjusting premiums and generating new policies based on identified disparities, enabling users to optimize coverage levels and costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If consumers rely on historical or statistical claim information to determine coverage levels, then coverage determination becomes more informed, but interpretation and application remains challenging requiring professional services

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclaim information interpretationVSAvoidcoverage determination process
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an insurance coverage modeler as an intermediary tool that bridges the gap between raw claim data and consumer understanding. This software application processes historical and statistical claim information automatically, presenting interpreted results in an accessible format without requiring consumers to directly analyze complex data or hire professionals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables consumers to independently determine optimal coverage levels by providing them with a self-service tool that automatically analyzes claim data and generates coverage recommendations. This eliminates the need for professional intermediaries while empowering consumers with actionable insights derived from their own claim history.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If consumers increase insurance coverage to avoid underinsurance, then financial protection improves, but premium costs increase due to overinsurance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefinancial protectionVSAvoidpremium costs
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The insurance coverage modeler implements feedback mechanisms that continuously analyze claim data and provide real-time recommendations on optimal coverage levels. The system compares actual claim patterns against current coverage, informing consumers whether they are underinsured or overinsured, enabling them to adjust coverage to match actual needs and avoid both underprotection and excessive premiums.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Measurement precision

If consumers seek professional insurance services to determine optimal coverage, then coverage accuracy improves, but service complexity and time requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoverage level accuracyVSAvoidservice time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical system of human professional analysis with an automated software-based modeler. The insurance coverage modeler uses algorithms to process claim data and determine optimal coverage levels, achieving professional-grade accuracy without the time investment required for human consultation. The system performs complex analyses instantaneously through computational processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS7966200B1Systems and methods for modeling insurance coverage
Publication Date: 2011.06.21 UNITED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOCIATION (USAA)
  • US7966200B1 patent drawing
  • US7966200B1 patent drawing
  • US7966200B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, system and computer-usable medium are disclosed for the modeling of insurance coverage. Coverage parameters of a policy are displayed as graphical elements within a user interface (UI) of a computing device along with a plurality of claim scenario parameters for selection by a user. Once selected, the claim scenario parameters are applied to relevant claim data and a claim scenario is generated. The claim scenario is then applied to the policy coverage parameters of the policy to determine and graphically display coverage parameter disparities, which are then graphically modified to offset any coverage parameter disparities. As coverage parameters are modified, corresponding adjustments to the premium of the current policy are made and displayed within the UI. A resulting policy is generated, using the modified coverage parameters of the current policy and adjusted premiums, and then fulfilled, electronically or physically.