Insurance Document Workflow Orchestration for Accurate OCR Extraction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional systems are inefficient in processing large volumes of complex business documents, particularly in the insurance industry, requiring significant human intervention due to data complexity, format variability, and quality issues, which hinders rapid and accurate analysis of risk and exposure.

Innovation Solution

A system utilizing machine learning models and multiple OCR engines to process documents efficiently, with human-in-the-loop tasks for quality assurance, enabling automated data extraction, transformation, and classification, and incorporating workflow orchestration for parallel processing of document portions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual review and processing of documents is used, then accuracy in evaluating complex business information is maintained, but productivity and processing speed deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveaccuracyVSAvoidprocessing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments document processing into multiple specialized components: OCR engines for text extraction, machine learning models for data extraction and classification, workflow orchestration for process management, and human review for quality assurance. This segmentation allows parallel processing of different document aspects, dramatically improving productivity while maintaining accuracy through specialized handling of each segment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system introduces machine learning models as intermediaries between raw document data and human reviewers. These models pre-process and extract relevant information, filtering and structuring data before human evaluation. This intermediary layer reduces the cognitive load on human reviewers and enables faster processing while maintaining high accuracy through model-assisted analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If multiple OCR engines are used to process documents, then measurement precision and data accuracy improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple OCR engines into a unified processing pipeline, where each engine processes the same document and their results are combined through consensus algorithms. This merging approach leverages the strengths of different OCR engines to improve accuracy while the unified pipeline architecture manages complexity through standardized interfaces and coordinated processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where OCR engine results are evaluated and compared, with lower-confidence results triggering re-processing or human review. This feedback loop ensures high accuracy by verifying uncertain extractions while the automated feedback system manages the complexity of coordinating multiple engines through rule-based decision making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If human-in-the-loop tasks are implemented for quality assurance, then reliability of data extraction improves, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality assuranceVSAvoidprocessing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies human-in-the-loop quality assurance selectively rather than universally. High-confidence extractions processed by multiple OCR engines and ML models bypass human review, while only lower-confidence or complex cases are routed to human reviewers. This partial application of human review maintains reliability for critical cases while preserving overall productivity through automated processing of routine cases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different quality assurance strategies to different parts of the processing workflow. Automated ML-based extraction handles routine document sections with high confidence, while human reviewers focus on complex or high-risk sections requiring nuanced judgment. This local differentiation of quality approaches optimizes both reliability and productivity by matching review intensity to document complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12579582B2System and method for processing document data
Publication Date: 2026.03.17 INSURANCE QUANTIFIED LLC
  • US12579582B2 patent drawing
  • US12579582B2 patent drawing
  • US12579582B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques including a system and method for processing insurance documents are provided. The techniques may involve the use of a system. The system may include a component configured to process a plurality of input document entities. The system may include a routing component configured to process the plurality of input document entities, wherein the routing component is configured to determine one or more workflows for processing at least one of the plurality of document entities. The system may include a workflow management component configured to process the at least one of the plurality of document entities.