Insurance Marketplace Negotiation Platform

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current systems lack transparency in insurance opportunities, product risks, and price competition, making it difficult for insurance carriers and brokers to effectively negotiate and facilitate transactions.

Innovation Solution

A system that connects insurance brokers and carriers through a database-driven platform, providing a negotiation interface and matching engine to identify suitable carriers based on search parameters, including profile, product, and risk information, facilitating negotiations and transactions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If a traditional insurance marketplace without a centralized platform is used, then carriers and brokers have more autonomy in negotiations, but transparency in insurance opportunities, product risks, and price competition deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransparency in insurance opportunities, product risks, and price competitionVSAvoidcomplexity of centralized negotiation platform
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a centralized negotiation platform as an intermediary between insurance carriers and brokers. This platform mediates the marketplace by providing a structured environment for negotiations while maintaining transparency through standardized information display protocols. The platform handles matching, communication, and transaction coordination without replacing the autonomous negotiation process, thus resolving the contradiction between transparency and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The negotiation platform is segmented into distinct functional modules: carrier profile display, product information presentation, broker search and matching, negotiation interface, and transaction processing. Each module handles specific aspects of the marketplace interaction, allowing transparency to be implemented in discrete areas without requiring complete system redesign, thereby reducing overall complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If manual carrier identification and matching processes are used, then system complexity is reduced, but productivity in identifying and negotiating insurance opportunities deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency in identifying and negotiating insurance opportunitiesVSAvoidcomplexity of matching engine and database system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and organizing carrier profiles, product information, and broker requirements into standardized database formats before negotiations begin. The matching engine pre-identifies potential carrier-broker pairs based on criteria matching, so that when negotiations start, both parties have already been pre-screened and pre-matched, significantly improving productivity without requiring complex real-time processing during negotiations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses digital copies and representations of carrier profiles, product catalogs, and broker requirements stored in databases. These digital copies allow the matching engine to efficiently compare and match parties without handling physical documents or manual data entry, dramatically increasing productivity while the copying process itself remains relatively simple and automated.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Ease of operation

If comprehensive carrier information is displayed to brokers, then negotiation effectiveness improves, but information overload and difficulty in identifying suitable carriers worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of carrier identification and selection for brokersVSAvoidvolume of carrier information displayed
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The platform applies local quality by providing different information views and detail levels to different user roles and at different stages of the negotiation process. Brokers receive customized information displays based on their specific search criteria, experience level, and negotiation stage. The matching engine prioritizes and highlights locally relevant information for each broker-carrier pair, making comprehensive information manageable through selective presentation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements partial action by initially displaying only the most relevant carrier information to brokers, such as basic profiles and key product features. Detailed carrier information, including comprehensive risk data and terms, is revealed progressively as negotiations advance and brokers express interest. This partial disclosure approach prevents information overload while ensuring comprehensive information is available when needed for effective negotiation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS9965807B1Systems for generating graphical user interfaces for facilitating an insurance marketplace for negotiations among brokers and insurance carriers
Publication Date: 2018.05.08 VERTAFORE
  • US9965807B1 patent drawing
  • US9965807B1 patent drawing
  • US9965807B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods are disclosed for providing leads for insurance market participants. A method may include a broker providing for consideration, their clients' insurance risk to be considered by multiple insurance capital providers. The broker can be provided with potential carrier matches based on analysis of broker and carrier insurance preferences, and previous transactions. Similarly, methods may include carriers disclosing their risk appetites, in the form of insurance products and services for consideration. The carrier may also be provided with potential broker and/or client matches based on analysis of the broker and carrier insurance preferences and previous transactions. Systems and apparatuses are also disclosed to implement the disclosed methods.