Automated Insurance Risk Segmentation via Electronic Auction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Insurance companies face lengthy and cumbersome processes when seeking reinsurance, requiring significant time and effort to negotiate with reinsurance providers, and often incur risks that are not accurately reflected in their premiums.

Innovation Solution

The system segments insurance policies into affinity groups based on risk levels, creating financial instruments that can be auctioned to investors, allowing for the distribution of profits and losses, thereby mitigating risk and reducing administrative burdens.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If insurance companies use traditional reinsurance processes to mitigate risk, then risk coverage is obtained, but the process becomes lengthy and cumbersome with significant time and effort required for negotiation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk coverageVSAvoidnegotiation time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the reinsurance process into automated electronic components, dividing policy portfolios into affinity groups based on risk characteristics. This segmentation enables parallel processing and automated matching with reinsurers, eliminating sequential negotiation delays while maintaining comprehensive risk coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an electronic intermediary platform that facilitates automated communication and matching between insurers and reinsurers. This intermediary system handles the negotiation process electronically, transmitting risk profiles, preferences, and terms automatically, thereby reducing negotiation time without compromising risk mitigation effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If insurance companies engage in extensive reinsurance negotiations to find suitable terms, then risk mitigation quality improves, but administrative burden and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk mitigation qualityVSAvoidadministrative burden
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables self-service through automated electronic systems where insurers and reinsurers independently input their risk profiles, preferences, and terms into the platform. The system automatically matches compatible parties and generates agreement terms, eliminating the need for manual administrative coordination while maintaining high risk mitigation quality through precise electronic matching.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical negotiation processes with electronic automated systems. Electronic data transmission, automated matching algorithms, and digital agreement generation substitute for manual paper-based administrative procedures, reducing complexity while preserving or enhancing risk mitigation quality through more precise and efficient processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If traditional reinsurance processes are used, then risk coverage is obtained, but the cost and terms may not be reflective of actual risk levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverisk coverageVSAvoidrisk score accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent incorporates feedback mechanisms where the electronic platform continuously processes risk data, claims information, and performance metrics to dynamically adjust matching criteria and pricing terms. This feedback loop ensures that reinsurance terms remain accurately reflective of actual risk levels, improving measurement precision while maintaining reliable risk coverage through data-driven adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10713728B1Risk mitigation for affinity groupings
Publication Date: 2020.07.14 STATE FARM MUTAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
  • US10713728B1 patent drawing
  • US10713728B1 patent drawing
  • US10713728B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Multiple insurance policies may be grouped or segmented into affinity groups, each of which corresponds to a respective risk level. A set of financial instruments corresponding to a particular affinity group of insurance policies may be created and automatically offered for auction, e.g., online. Bids received from potential investors may indicate, e.g., percentage of assumed risk, percentage of profit sharing, percentage of shared loss, service or commission fee amounts, etc. that are acceptable to the bidding party. The party or parties submitting the winning bids may be awarded investment in the financial instruments and may enter into respective financial agreements with the financial instrument provider, thereby securitizing the risk associated with the insurance policies. Profits and/or losses generated by the insurance policies of the affinity group corresponding to the financial instruments may be distributed in accordance with the terms of the financial agreement.