Intake Particle Detection Verification Using Multi-Opening Exit Timing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for verifying the functionality of intake particle detection systems are time-consuming and economically inefficient, particularly due to the limited significance of transit time measurements at only the last intake opening, and often require additional components like valves, increasing costs and susceptibility to malfunctions.

Innovation Solution

A method involving directing a test fluid flow from a generator towards intake openings, measuring actual exit times using a timer, and comparing them with pre-defined target exit times or ranges stored on a data carrier, allowing comprehensive verification of the system's components, including filters, fittings, and intake openings, with reduced time and increased informative value.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If transit time measurements are performed only at the last intake opening, then the measurement process is simplified, but the verification significance is reduced and time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification timeVSAvoidverification significance
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the verification process into multiple measurement points along the pipe branch. Instead of measuring only at the last intake opening, the method segments the measurement locations to include intermediate intake openings, thereby reducing total verification time while maintaining comprehensive system assessment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a test fluid with known properties and predetermined target exit times before actual operation. By establishing expected transit times in advance for multiple measurement points, the system enables rapid comparison and verification without time-consuming repeated measurements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If additional components like valves are added to the system, then functionality verification capability is improved, but device complexity and susceptibility to malfunctions increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs the existing fluid conduction system components (pipes, intake openings, flow means) to perform the verification function. The test fluid flows through the existing system without requiring additional valves or complex test equipment, allowing the system to verify itself using its own operational components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a test fluid as an intermediary substance to carry verification information through the system. This test fluid acts as a mediator that interacts with existing system components to reveal their functionality without requiring physical modification or additional mechanical components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive verification of all components is performed, then verification accuracy is improved, but time consumption and economic efficiency worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveverification accuracyVSAvoideconomic efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the verification approach from physical inspection of each component to measuring transit time parameters of a test fluid. By monitoring temporal parameters (exit times) at multiple points, the system achieves comprehensive verification of filters, fittings, and intake openings through a single fluid flow test, significantly improving economic efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method significantly reduces verification time while providing comprehensive and economical assessment of the intake particle detection system's functionality, detecting impairments such as leaks, blockages, or malfunctions across all intake openings, and facilitating automated or manual detection.

Implementation Method 1

a test fluid is introduced via the test fluid line and/or the test fluid connection into the fluid conduction system, wherein a test fluid flow is generated within the at least one pipe and/or hose line

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow:

Implementation Method 2

a flow means for generating a fluid sample flow within the at least one pipe and/or hose line, wherein the fluid sample flow is directed from the one or more intake openings in the direction of the detection unit

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow generation:

Data Source

PatentUS12525121B2Method and test device for verifying the functionality of an intake particle detection system
Publication Date: 2026.01.13 WAGNER GROUP GMBH
  • US12525121B2 patent drawing
  • US12525121B2 patent drawing
  • US12525121B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for verifying the functionality of an intake particle detection system (100), in particular an intake fire detection system. A test fluid flow (220) within at least one pipe and/or hose line (110, 120) is directed in such a way that the test fluid (210) from the test fluid generator (230) enters the fluid conduction system (110, 120, 130) and exits from the one or more intake openings. Respective actual exit times from the introduction and/or entry of the test fluid (210) into the fluid conduction system until the exit of the test fluid (210) from a respective intake opening are detected by means of a timer. Detected actual exit times are compared with a data set (261) which is stored on a data carrier (160, 260), and which comprises target exit times and/or target exit time ranges associated with the respective intake openings (A, B, C, . . . X).