Intake Runner Vane for Spark-Knock Suppression

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods to mitigate spark-knock in internal combustion engines either reduce engine performance or efficiency, as they either rely on retarding spark timing or lowering compression ratio, which are not optimal solutions.

Innovation Solution

A vane is mounted inside the intake runner of a spark-ignition internal combustion engine to direct the fuel-air charge to a predetermined region within the combustion chamber where spark-knock occurs, detected by a knock-sensor and controlled by an Engine Control Unit, minimizing spark-knock while maintaining engine performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Object-affected harmful factors

If spark timing is retarded to minimize spark-knock, then spark-knock is reduced, but engine power and efficiency deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespark-knockVSAvoidengine power
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a vane that redirects the fuel-air charge to a specific localized region within the combustion chamber where spark-knock is most likely to occur. This creates a local quality change by concentrating the charge in a predetermined area, allowing knock suppression without globally retarding spark timing, thus preserving engine power and efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Object-affected harmful factors

If compression ratio is reduced to eliminate spark-knock, then spark-knock is eliminated, but engine power and efficiency deteriorate under all operating conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespark-knockVSAvoidengine power
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of globally reducing compression ratio, the patent uses a vane to create a localized charge concentration in a specific combustion chamber region. This local quality approach suppresses spark-knock in the critical area while maintaining the overall compression ratio, preserving engine power and efficiency across all operating conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Object-affected harmful factors

If fuel-air charge is continuously directed to a localized region, then spark-knock is minimized, but operating efficiency deteriorates after steady combustion is initiated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespark-knockVSAvoidoperating efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements periodic action by using the ECU to control the vane based on knock-sensor detection. The vane is activated only when spark-knock is detected and deactivated when knock is eliminated, rather than operating continuously. This periodic operation maintains knock suppression while preserving operating efficiency during normal combustion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs feedback control where the knock-sensor detects spark-knock and sends signals to the ECU, which then activates or deactivates the vane accordingly. This closed-loop feedback ensures the vane operates only when necessary to suppress knock, eliminating the need for continuous operation and preserving operating efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively reduces spark-knock by directing the fuel-air charge to the high-temperature, high-pressure region, thereby minimizing premature detonation, leading to improved engine operation and efficiency without compromising power output.

Implementation Method 1

a knock-sensor mounted on the engine block and arranged to detect a predetermined minimum magnitude of engine block vibration which is indicative of spark-knock

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVibration detection: Vibration

Implementation Method 2

A vane is mounted inside the intake runner, and is arranged to direct the fuel-air charge to a predetermined region inside the combustion chamber in response to the signal generated by the ECU

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFluid flow direction:

Implementation Method 3

the ignition by a spark plug of the inlet fuel-air charge

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 4

Spark-knock occurs when fuel inside the cylinder combustion chamber is prematurely detonated as a result of rapid temperature and pressure rise due to combined compression by the piston and the ignition by a spark plug

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpark ignition: Electric Spark

Implementation Method 5

rapid temperature and pressure rise due to combined compression by the piston

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Data Source

PatentUS7490591B2Method and apparatus for eliminating spark-knock in an engine
Publication Date: 2009.02.17 FCA US LLC
  • US7490591B2 patent drawing
  • US7490591B2 patent drawing
  • US7490591B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An apparatus for minimizing spark-knock within a combustion chamber of a spark-ignition internal combustion engine, whereby a control vane mounted inside the intake runner is arranged to direct a fuel-air charge to a region inside the combustion chamber where spark-knock has been empirically determined to occur.