Cylinder Deactivation via Intake Valve Segmentation
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Increasing engine power output through cylinder deactivation is costly due to the complexity of deactivating valve operators, and existing methods do not effectively reduce engine pumping losses and maintain cost-effectiveness.
Innovation Solution
The system selectively deactivates engine cylinders by closing intake valves using a deactivating intake valve operator without a deactivating exhaust valve operator, allowing non-deactivating exhaust valve operators to maintain exhaust flow, thereby reducing costs and pumping losses.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Adaptability or versatility
If deactivating valve operators are used to close both intake and exhaust valves for cylinder deactivation, then cylinder deactivation is achieved, but device complexity and cost increase significantly
Solution Approach 1:
The valve operator system is segmented into two distinct types: deactivating valve operators for intake valves and non-deactivating valve operators for exhaust valves. This segmentation allows the intake valve to be selectively deactivated while the exhaust valve continues to operate normally, reducing the overall complexity of the deactivation system.
Solution Approach 2:
Different quality characteristics are applied to different parts of the valve operator system. The intake valve operator is designed with deactivation capability (local quality of selectivity), while the exhaust valve operator maintains simple non-deactivating characteristics (local quality of simplicity), optimizing the system for both deactivation functionality and cost-effectiveness.
2Power
If more cylinders are activated to increase engine power output, then engine power increases, but engine pumping losses and friction increase
Solution Approach 1:
The engine operates dynamically by selectively activating or deactivating cylinders based on real-time power demands. When full power is not required, certain cylinders are deactivated to reduce pumping losses and friction, while maintaining the capability to activate all cylinders when maximum power output is needed.
3Adaptability or versatility
If deactivating valve operators are used for exhaust valves, then complete cylinder deactivation is achieved, but manufacturing cost increases
Solution Approach 1:
The valve operator system is segmented into two distinct types: deactivating valve operators for intake valves and non-deactivating valve operators for exhaust valves. This segmentation allows the intake valve to be selectively deactivated while the exhaust valve continues to operate normally, reducing the overall complexity of the deactivation system.
Solution Approach 2:
The system uses simpler, less expensive non-deactivating valve operators for exhaust valves instead of costly deactivating operators. This approach accepts that exhaust valves will continue to operate mechanically even during cylinder deactivation, prioritizing cost-effectiveness over complete deactivation of all valve functions.
Data Source
AI summary
Systems and methods for operating an engine with deactivating and non-deactivating valves is presented. In one example, the engine may include non-deactivating intake valves, deactivating intake valves, and only non-deactivating exhaust valves. The non-deactivating exhaust valves may operate to open and close during an engine cycle while deactivating intake valves remain closed during the engine cycle to prevent air flow through selected engine cylinders.


