Integral Bent Razor Blade Design for Manufacturing Efficiency

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The assembly of L-shaped razor blades with separate cutting and support parts is logistically and technically challenging, particularly at high manufacturing speeds, leading to precision issues and corrosion, which complicates the development of integral bent blades that require both formability and cutting performance while considering manufacturing processes and costs.

Innovation Solution

The use of martensitic stainless steel with a carbon content between 0.62% and 0.75% for integrally formed rigid razor blades with a bent portion, optimized for formability and strength, and the design of razor heads with movable blades having a specific cantilever dimension and radius of curvature to enhance shaving performance and manufacturing efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If separate cutting part and support part are assembled to form L-shaped razor blade, then cutting performance and support function can be optimized separately, but manufacturing complexity and assembly difficulty increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of manufactureVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the cutting part and support part into a single integral L-shaped blade structure. This eliminates the assembly step between separate parts, reducing manufacturing complexity while maintaining the functional advantages of having distinct cutting and support sections. The integral structure is achieved through single-piece fabrication processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Reliability

If integral bent blade is used instead of assembled supported blade, then assembly precision and corrosion resistance improve, but manufacturing difficulty increases due to formability requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereliabilityVSAvoidease of manufacture
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent specifies precise material composition parameters (carbon: 0.35-0.43%, molybdenum: 0.90-1.35%, manganese: 0.40-0.90%, chromium: 13-14%) to achieve the optimal balance between formability for bending and strength for reliable cutting performance. These parameter changes enable the integral bent structure to be manufactured reliably.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local heat treatment to specific portions of the blade to increase ductility where bending is required, while maintaining high strength in the cutting edges. This localized modification of material properties enables the integral structure to achieve both formability and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Productivity

If high speed manufacturing is used for assembling supported blades, then productivity increases, but assembly precision deteriorates and handling difficulty increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidmanufacturing precision
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

By combining the cutting part and support part into a single integral component, the patent eliminates the assembly operation entirely. This resolves the contradiction between high-speed manufacturing and assembly precision, as the single-piece structure requires no joining operations regardless of production speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Strength

If material with higher carbon content is used for integral bent blade, then cutting edge strength improves, but formability of bent portion deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestrengthVSAvoidease of manufacture
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the carbon content to 0.35-0.43%, which provides sufficient cutting edge strength while maintaining adequate formability for bending. This specific parameter range resolves the contradiction between strength and formability that would exist with higher carbon contents.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local heat treatment to the bent portion to increase ductility specifically where needed, while maintaining higher strength in the cutting edges. This localized property modification allows the use of higher overall carbon content for strength while preserving formability in critical areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS10843355B2Razor blade, razor head, and method of manufacture
Publication Date: 2020.11.24 BIC VIOLEX SA
  • US10843355B2 patent drawing
  • US10843355B2 patent drawing
  • US10843355B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An integrally formed rigid razor blade is provided. The razor blade includes a cutting edge portion extending along a cutting edge portion axis and having a cutting edge at one end, a base portion extending along a base portion axis, and a bent portion intermediate the cutting edge portion and the base portion. The bent portion has an average radius of curvature of between 0.4 millimeters and 1.00 millimeters. The cutting edge portion has a cantilever dimension which is a constant distance of between 1.1 millimeters and 1.8 millimeters when measured from the cutting edge portion to the base portion axis.