Integral Intake Manifold EGR via Additive Manufacturing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The complexity and time-consuming nature of assembling traditional intake manifolds for internal combustion engines, which limits manufacturing efficiency, increases costs, and restricts optimal air-flow shapes due to the need for multiple parts and seals.

Innovation Solution

An integral intake manifold design featuring a unitary, seamless construction with a plenum and channels that transition smoothly into runners, eliminating the need for seals and allowing for optimized air-flow distribution, incorporating features like a gooseneck conduit and additive fluid delivery ports integrated through additive manufacturing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional multi-part intake manifold design is used, then assembly complexity increases and manufacturing time increases, but manufacturing precision and reliability are maintained through multiple seals and connections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing efficiencyVSAvoidassembly complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple separate components (intake manifold body, runners, EGR system, fluid delivery ports) into a single integrated monolithic structure manufactured through additive manufacturing. This eliminates the need for assembly operations and seals while maintaining all required functions, directly resolving the contradiction between productivity and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated intake manifold structure performs multiple functions simultaneously: distributing intake air, recirculating exhaust gas, delivering additive fluids, and providing structural support. This multi-functionality in a single component eliminates the need for separate parts and assembly operations, improving manufacturing efficiency while reducing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of manufacture

If traditional multi-part design with seals is used, then reliability is maintained through sealed connections, but manufacturing costs increase and optimal air-flow shapes are restricted

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing costVSAvoidair-flow optimization
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

By combining all manifold components into a single additive-manufactured part, the patent eliminates seal-related manufacturing steps and reduces overall production cost. The seamless integrated structure enables precise control over internal airflow paths that would be difficult to achieve with assembled parts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The additive manufacturing process enables complex internal geometries and optimized airflow shapes that are not feasible with traditional machining or assembly methods. The manifold features smoothly transitioning channels and runners with precise dimensional control, improving air-flow characteristics while reducing manufacturing cost through direct production.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If seamless integrated design is used, then manufacturing complexity and costs are reduced, but assembly precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly simplicityVSAvoidmonolithic precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical assembly processes with additive manufacturing technology. This substitution eliminates the need for precise mechanical fitting and sealing between multiple parts, as the entire structure is built as a single precision component through layer-by-layer deposition, directly addressing the precision requirement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

Additive manufacturing enables precise control of material deposition parameters to achieve the required monolithic precision. The process controls layer thickness, material flow, and structural integrity to produce seamless internal channels and surfaces that would be extremely difficult to achieve through traditional manufacturing and assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Loss of time

If traditional assembly process is used, then manufacturing time increases, but quality control becomes more difficult with multiple parts and seals

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing timeVSAvoidquality control
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The integrated monolithic structure eliminates all assembly operations, reducing manufacturing time to essentially the single additive manufacturing process step. Quality control is simplified by removing multiple interfaces and seals that would require inspection and adjustment, as the seamless structure is produced as one piece with consistent quality throughout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The additive manufacturing process inherently ensures consistent quality throughout the monolithic structure through controlled material deposition. The process self-regulates to maintain uniform properties across the entire component, eliminating the variability introduced by assembly operations and multiple part interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS20190219005A1Exhaust gas recirculator of an integral intake manifold
Publication Date: 2019.07.18 FORD GLOBAL TECH LLC
  • US20190219005A1 patent drawing
  • US20190219005A1 patent drawing
  • US20190219005A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An engine system includes an exhaust manifold, an exhaust flow having a valve configured to release exhaust gas, and stratified layers defining an integrated intake manifold and an exhaust gas recirculator including a tubular inlet on an exterior of the intake manifold. The inlet defines at least one branch extending into an interior of the intake manifold without a seal between the exhaust gas recirculator and manifold. The at least one branch extends into at least one wing to form a duct containing a plurality of nozzles protruding from the duct into the interior.