Integral Subfloor Hull for Rotary Wing Aircraft Weight Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current rotorcraft subfloor structures face challenges in reducing structural weight, design complexity, assembly work, and production costs due to increasing cruising speeds, payload demands, and the need for lighter, cleaner, and longer-range aircraft, while also dealing with high local stress levels and inefficiencies in composite material usage.

Innovation Solution

A subfloor structure featuring an integral U-shaped subfloor bowl hull with upward web portions and external extensions, made from composite or metal materials, which integrates main load-bearing components to reduce assembly workload and increase mechanical performance, eliminating discrete load deflections and stress concentrations by providing a continuous, tangentially smooth load path.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If a classical framework construction with discrete longerons and ribs is used, then the subfloor structure provides adequate structural support, but the structural weight and assembly complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural supportVSAvoidstructural weight
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the discrete longerons and bottom shell into a single integrated load-bearing structure. The continuous curved load path integrates what were previously separate components (longerons, ribs, bottom shell) into one unified structure, eliminating the need for discrete connections and reducing overall structural weight while maintaining strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated structure is segmented into functional zones: the bottom shell portion, upward web portions, and upper external extensions. This segmentation allows optimization of material distribution in different regions while maintaining the continuous load path, reducing weight compared to a fully discrete framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Shape

If discrete longerons with kink locations are used to adapt to outer loft geometry, then the structure fits the aircraft envelope, but local stress concentrations increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to outer loftVSAvoidlocal stress concentration
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs continuous curved surfaces throughout the load-bearing structure, eliminating sharp kinks and angular transitions. The bottom shell, web portions, and extensions are all defined by smooth continuous curves that adapt to the outer loft geometry while distributing stresses uniformly without local concentrations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

Solution Approach 2:

By integrating the longerons into the bottom shell as a continuous structure, the patent eliminates the discrete kink locations where stress concentrations occurred in classical designs. The merged structure provides smooth transitions that adapt to the aircraft envelope while maintaining structural integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple separate components are assembled to form the subfloor structure, then manufacturing flexibility is maintained, but assembly workload and production costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing flexibilityVSAvoidassembly workload
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple load-bearing components into a single integrated structure that can be manufactured as one piece using composite material processes. This merging eliminates the need for assembling discrete longerons, ribs, and bottom shells, dramatically reducing assembly workload and production costs while maintaining adaptability through tailored composite layups.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated structure is manufactured using composite materials that allow for complex three-dimensional shapes to be formed in single-piece construction. The composite manufacturing process provides the flexibility needed to adapt to different outer loft geometries while enabling the integration of multiple functions into one component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

4Reliability

If classical framework construction is used, then structural reliability is maintained through discrete connections, but the number of joints and potential failure points increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural reliabilityVSAvoidnumber of joints
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

By merging the discrete longerons and bottom shell into a single continuous structure, the patent eliminates numerous joints and connection points that served as potential failure points in classical designs. The integrated structure maintains reliability through continuous material paths while reducing complexity by removing the need for discrete connections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS9688381B2Subfloor structure with an integral hull for a rotary wing aircraft
Publication Date: 2017.06.27 AIRBUS HELICOPTERS DEUT GMBH
  • US9688381B2 patent drawing
  • US9688381B2 patent drawing
  • US9688381B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention relates to a subfloor structure with an integral hull, for a rotary wing aircraft. The subfloor structure comprises an integral subfloor hull that defines in one piece, upward web portions acting as longerons and a bottom central portion offering both load bearing capabilities and aerodynamical loft features. The subfloor structure is useful for rotary wing aircrafts such as helicopters, and is e.g. made of composite and/or light alloy such as aluminum.