Integrally Molded Spring Lock for Tool-Free Pipe Retention

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing securing mechanisms for elements in heating technology, such as water-carrying lines, often require additional tools for disassembly and can be overly secure for protected locations, making them cumbersome to release.

Innovation Solution

Integrally connected springs within the receiving body provide a form-fitting lock for the securing element, allowing for easy assembly and reversible disassembly without the need for additional tools, by using cylindrical openings and guides that allow force transmission and a spring mechanism with rounded stops.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a separate securing device is used to secure the securing element, then the security element is reliably secured and cannot be lost, but the disassembly requires additional tools and becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecurity element retentionVSAvoiddisassembly ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The securing device is integrated into the receiving body as a single component, combining the functions of the receiving body and securing device. The springs are directly formed in the receiving body, eliminating the need for separate securing devices and tools for disassembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The springs automatically secure the securing element when it is inserted into the receiving body, without requiring additional tools or complex operations. The securing and releasing functions are self-contained within the integrated structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If a locking mechanism is used to prevent unintentional disassembly, then security is improved, but the device becomes more complex and harder to operate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprevention of unintentional disassemblyVSAvoidsecuring device structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The locking function is merged into the receiving body through integrally formed springs, eliminating separate locking components. The springs are directly molded into the receiving body, simplifying the overall structure while maintaining the locking function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The springs change their physical state between stressed and unstressed positions to provide the locking and releasing functions. When the securing element is inserted, the springs are compressed; when released, they return to their original position, providing automatic securing without complex mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Ease of operation

If the securing element is easily removable, then ease of operation is improved, but the risk of unintentional disassembly increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecuring element removalVSAvoidprotection from inadvertent tampering
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The springs are positioned at specific locations within the receiving body to provide localized securing forces. The guides are also strategically placed to constrain the securing element's movement, allowing easy removal in the intended direction while preventing unintended disassembly through proper geometric design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The springs have rounded stops that engage with the securing element, providing smooth contact surfaces. This curved geometry allows the securing element to be easily pushed in and removed along the axial direction while the rounded shape of the springs provides continuous contact for reliable securing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

4Reliability

If additional securing components are added to prevent loss, then security is improved, but the manufacturing complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesecuring element retentionVSAvoidproduction simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The springs and receiving body are manufactured as a single integrated component, eliminating the need for separate production and assembly of securing devices. This integration simplifies manufacturing processes and reduces production costs while maintaining reliable securing function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The receiving body serves multiple functions: it receives the securing element, provides guides for its movement, and contains the springs for automatic securing. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate securing components, simplifying both manufacturing and assembly.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables secure fixation and easy release of elements, ensuring they remain captive yet easily removable, with forces transmitted through the securing element, suitable for both pressureless and pressure-controlled systems.

Implementation Method 1

springs (2) with rounded stops (3) which, in the unstressed state, are located in the displacement path of the securing element (11)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP1881252B1Safety device for a safety element
Publication Date: 2013.09.11 GEALAN FORMTEILE
  • EP1881252B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1881252B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP1881252B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

The lock (11) to secure a water pipe at the passage opening (7) through a holder (1) has a spring (2), in one piece with the holder, outside the passage opening. The spring secures the inserted lock through a cylindrical opening (18) in a positive fit. The spring has a limit stop (3), with a rounded or pointed surface towards the movement direction of the lock. The springs have an elasticity giving a force fit holding action which can be overcome.