Integrated AESA Radar Calibration with XR Loopback Measurement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing AESA-based radar systems lack a cost-effective method for in-situ self-calibration that accurately measures relative amplitude and phase differences across hundreds or thousands of RF channels, necessitating expensive precision test equipment and failing to integrate transceiver/AESA top-level calibration for real-time operational verification and health monitoring.

Innovation Solution

A radar receiver/excitor (XR) functions as a precision multi-channel relative amplitude and phase measurement device, performing iterative self-calibration of AESA quadrants using signal injection loopback techniques, eliminating the need for separate calibration devices and enabling system-level health monitoring and self-healing calibration.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing AESA calibration methodologies utilize precision test equipment (PNAs), then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveamplitude and phase measurement precisionVSAvoidcalibration equipment complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The transceiver calibrates itself by using its own transmit signal and receiver channels, eliminating the need for external precision test equipment. The system performs self-calibration by measuring relative amplitude and phase differences across its own Rx channels using signal injection loopback techniques

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The transceiver serves dual functions: normal radar operation and self-calibration. The same transmit and receive channels used for radar detection are also used for calibration measurements, making the calibration system universal and eliminating separate dedicated calibration equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Device complexity

If transceiver self-calibration is implemented, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision may worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecalibration system complexityVSAvoidrelative amplitude and phase measurement precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses signal injection loopback techniques where the transmit signal is fed back through the receive channels, allowing the transceiver to measure and characterize its own channel responses. This feedback mechanism enables precise relative amplitude and phase measurements without external equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical precision test equipment (PNAs) with an electronic self-calibration system using software-based signal processing and digital signal injection techniques, substituting complex hardware with more manageable electronic and software solutions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If iterative quadrant calibration is performed, then measurement precision is improved, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAESA quadrant calibration precisionVSAvoidcalibration time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The AESA is divided into quadrants or subarrays that can be calibrated iteratively and independently. This segmentation allows the calibration process to break down a large complex system into manageable sections, improving measurement precision while enabling parallel or sequential processing to reduce overall calibration time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

4Reliability

If comprehensive hierarchical calibration is implemented, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveradar system reliabilityVSAvoidcalibration scheme complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The calibration system is organized hierarchically into segments: transceiver-level calibration, quadrant/subarray-level calibration, and full AESA calibration. This segmentation allows comprehensive calibration to be performed in manageable stages, improving reliability while keeping each calibration step relatively simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The transceiver performs preliminary self-calibration before AESA-level calibration, establishing a foundation of known good measurements. This preliminary action ensures that subsequent calibration steps build upon accurate baseline data, improving overall reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP4597156A1Integrated AESA/radar in-situ calibration
Publication Date: 2025.08.06 ROCKWELL COLLINS INC
  • EP4597156A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4597156A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4597156A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A system for insitu AESA calibration includes a radar receiver / excitor (XR). The calibrated XR functions as a precision multi-channel relative amplitude and phase microwave frequency measurement device that executes a known AESA calibration methodology. An integrated RF sensor system-level built in test (BIT) is utilized for prognostic health monitoring and self-healing calibration. During calibration, quadrants of the AESA are iteratively calibrated via measurements by the XR. I/Q values are balanced for each quadrant relative to each other without the need for a separately calibrated measurement device for absolute calibration. A near field probe may be disposed for radiative loopback measurements. A T/R calibration circuit receives the loopback measurements and data from a Tx channel.