Integrated Cabin Server Unit for Aircraft Weight Reduction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional aircraft cabin management systems (CMS) are cumbersome due to separate Line Replaceable Units (LRUs) for communication, networking, and avionics, leading to increased weight, complexity, and power consumption, with inefficient data transfer and integration between domains.

Innovation Solution

An integrated Cabin Server Unit (CSU) consolidates the functions of Cabin Server, Information Management System, Airborne Data Router, and telephony switching into a single unit, providing a 'smart' data router for efficient communication between Avionics, Passenger, and Off-Aircraft domains, with enhanced security and routing capabilities, and Modular Seat Interface Units for reduced wiring and installation complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If separate LRUs are used for communication, networking, and avionics functions, then system functionality is maintained, but weight, complexity, and power consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem functionalityVSAvoidweight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple separate Line Replaceable Units (LRUs) including the Cabin Server Unit, Information Management System, Airborne Data Router, and telephony switching system into a single integrated CSU. This consolidation reduces the number of separate components, thereby reducing weight while maintaining all necessary communication, networking, and avionics functions through unified hardware and software architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated CSU is designed to perform multiple functions simultaneously - serving as a cabin server, information management system, data router, and telephony switch. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate dedicated hardware for each function, reducing overall system weight while preserving complete operational capability across all domains.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If separate LRUs are used for communication, networking, and avionics functions, then system functionality is maintained, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem functionalityVSAvoidcomplexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent consolidates multiple complex subsystems into a single integrated CSU, reducing the number of interfaces, cable runs, and integration points required between separate LRUs. This merging simplifies the overall system architecture while maintaining all necessary communication pathways between avionics, passenger, and off-aircraft domains.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

While integrating functions, the patent employs modular software architecture and functional segmentation within the unified CSU, allowing complex operations to be managed through organized software modules rather than complex hardware interconnections. This software-based segmentation reduces hardware complexity while preserving system functionality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If separate LRUs are used for communication, networking, and avionics functions, then system functionality is maintained, but power consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem functionalityVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The integrated CSU consolidates multiple power-consuming subsystems into a single power management unit, enabling unified power distribution and reduced overall power consumption through optimized hardware architecture and shared power supply infrastructure while maintaining all necessary operational functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Device complexity

If fewer, larger LRUs are used, then equipment count is reduced, but cable run length increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment countVSAvoidcable run length
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLength of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates multiple functions into the CSU, reducing the number of separate equipment pieces that require interconnection. This consolidation reduces the total length of cable runs needed to connect separate LRUs, as the integrated unit serves as a central hub for multiple communication, networking, and avionics functions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS9197906B1Aircraft cabin management system
Publication Date: 2015.11.24 ROCKWELL COLLINS INC
  • US9197906B1 patent drawing
  • US9197906B1 patent drawing

AI summary

An aircraft cabin management system including a) a communication interface system; b) a seat interface system; c) at least one Cabin Distribution Unit (CDU); and, d) a communication network. The communication interface system includes an integrated Cabin Server Unit (CSU) providing the combined functionality of aircraft communications, networking, and computational resources; and, an Information Maintenance Portal (IMP) providing maintenance access for the users of the aircraft cabin management system and the users of avionics equipment. The seat interface system includes a number of Modular Seat Interface Units (MSIUs), each MSIU providing device input/output connections for a defined portion of the interior of the aircraft cabin. The communication network operatively interconnects the communication interface system; the seat interface system; and the at least one CDU, as well as other equipment installed in the aircraft. The aircraft cabin management system provides an integrated communications and service backbone.