Integrated Aircraft De-icing Panel with Trabecular Core

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current de-icing systems for aircraft are complex, costly, and inefficient, with multiple discrete components increasing maintenance time and weight, and often result in suboptimal hot air fluid force and high electric power requirements, which are not scalable for large aircraft.

Innovation Solution

A structurally integrated de-icing system using a single-piece, multi-layer panel with integrated hot air ducts and trabecular core that optimizes hot air distribution directly within the aircraft structure, reducing weight and complexity, and utilizing additive manufacturing to minimize parts and assembly costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If multiple discrete components (ducts, stiffeners, brackets, connections, nozzles) are used for thermal de-icing systems, then the de-icing function is achieved, but the device complexity and maintenance time increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvede-icing functionVSAvoidnumber of discrete components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple discrete de-icing components (ducts, stiffeners, brackets, connections, nozzles) into a single integrated thermal de-icing system. This consolidation maintains the de-icing function while dramatically reducing device complexity and maintenance requirements by eliminating the need for separate components and their associated assembly/disassembly operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated thermal de-icing system performs multiple functions simultaneously: it provides de-icing capability, structural support, and thermal management through a single unified design. This multi-functionality eliminates the need for separate dedicated components for each function, thereby reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If multiple discrete components are used for thermal de-icing systems, then the de-icing function is achieved, but the manufacturing costs and production time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvede-icing functionVSAvoidmanufacturing cost and production time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By combining multiple de-icing components into a single integrated system, the patent reduces manufacturing costs and production time. The unified design eliminates the need to manufacture, quality-test, and assemble multiple separate parts, thereby streamlining the manufacturing process and reducing overall production time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Reliability

If inefficient de-icing systems with low thermal efficiency are used, then the de-icing function is achieved, but more hot air must be bled from the engine, reducing aircraft performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvede-icing functionVSAvoidhot air bleeding from engine
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the thermal efficiency parameters of the de-icing system by improving heat distribution characteristics. This allows the system to achieve effective de-icing with reduced hot air bleeding from the engine, thereby minimizing energy loss and maintaining aircraft performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If discrete de-icing components are added to the aircraft structure, then the de-icing function is provided, but the aircraft weight increases, reducing payload capacity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvede-icing functionVSAvoidaircraft weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The integrated thermal de-icing system merges the de-icing function with the aircraft's existing structural components. This integration eliminates the need for separate heavy de-icing components, thereby reducing the overall weight added to the aircraft and preserving payload capacity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution significantly reduces hot air bleeding from the engine, minimizes maintenance complexity, and achieves improved thermal efficiency, structural integrity, and aerodynamics while allowing for interchangeable de-icing configurations and reduced environmental impact.

Implementation Method 1

a single tube (13) which transfers the hot air bled from the engine compressor and distributes it to the multi-layer panel (17) through the slot (14)

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal convection: Convection

Implementation Method 2

the layer (15) inside the multi-layer panel (17) that is also made integrally in a single component

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal insulation: Thermal Insulation

Data Source

PatentUS12091177B2Aircraft equipped with a structurally integrated de-icing system
Publication Date: 2024.09.17 POLITECNICO DI TORINO
  • US12091177B2 patent drawing
  • US12091177B2 patent drawing
  • US12091177B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An aircraft (A) comprising at least a component part (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8) provided with thermal de-icing means (S) suitable to eliminate and/or prevent the formation of ice on said component part, said de-icing means (S) are directly integrated in the structure of said part (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8).