Integrated Drive Unit Control for Reprogrammable Robot Grippers

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing drive units for automation components, such as gripping and pivoting units, are inflexible and not suitable for human-robot cooperation due to their inability to be reprogrammed and lack of redundancy in control systems, which limits their adaptability and safety in dynamic environments.

Innovation Solution

A drive unit equipped with a computing device running a higher programming language operating system, allowing for flexible programming and redundant data processing, eliminating the need for a separate motor controller, and integrating sensors for real-time monitoring and control, enabling direct control of electric drives and ensuring functional safety in human-robot cooperation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If control units and motor controllers are separately formed with fixed programming, then the system provides stable control functionality, but the system lacks flexibility and cannot be reprogrammed for changing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveflexibilityVSAvoidcontrol system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the control unit and motor controller into a single integrated device. The control unit includes a microcontroller that directly generates motor control signals without requiring a separate motor controller, thereby eliminating the need for separate power electronics components and reducing overall system complexity while maintaining full control functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit is designed with universal functionality to perform both control and motor control tasks. The microcontroller can execute different programming languages (C, C++, Python) and implement various control strategies (PID, fuzzy logic, neural networks), making the single device adaptable to multiple applications and changing requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Adaptability or versatility

If control units are programmed at the lowest programming level, then the system provides precise control, but the system cannot be reprogrammed after installation or requires great effort to reprogram

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereprogrammabilityVSAvoidprogramming effort
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit employs dynamic reconfigurability through support for multiple programming languages and development environments. The microcontroller can be programmed post-manufacturing using standard tools and languages like C, C++, or Python, allowing the system to adapt to changing requirements without requiring complex reprogramming efforts or specialized low-level programming knowledge

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary layer in the form of a development environment that sits between the user and the microcontroller. This environment provides high-level programming interfaces and libraries that simplify the programming process while still enabling precise control, eliminating the need for users to work directly at the lowest programming level

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Reliability

If separate control units and motor controllers are used with bus systems, then the system provides modular control, but the system lacks redundancy and is not suitable for human-robot cooperation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional safetyVSAvoidcontrol system structure
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines control and motor control functions in a single integrated unit, eliminating the need for complex bus systems and multiple communication interfaces. This reduction in system complexity removes potential failure points while maintaining full control functionality, thereby improving reliability for safety-critical applications like human-robot cooperation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit incorporates direct feedback mechanisms from sensors to the microcontroller, enabling real-time monitoring and control without requiring intermediate communication buses. This direct feedback path ensures functional safety by providing immediate response to system states and eliminating communication delays or failures that could compromise safety

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11413749B2Drive unit of an automation component, in particular a gripping, clamping, and changing or pivoting unit
Publication Date: 2022.08.16 SCHUNK GMBH & CO KG
  • US11413749B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Drive unit of an automation component, in particular a gripping, clamping, changing, linear or pivoting unit, whereby the drive unit includes a drive for driving the movable parts of the automation component and a control unit which controls the drive, whereby the control unit includes at least one computing device, and the drive unit together with the drive, control unit and computing device is arranged in or on a base housing of the automation component.