Integrated Loop and Valve Control for Low-Latency Process Operation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Process control systems in industrial plants face delays and increased complexity due to the need for multiple devices and communication links, making real-time diagnostics and control loop optimization challenging.

Innovation Solution

An integrated digital process controller that operates locally to perform PID control, diagnostics, and real-time learning, capable of receiving setpoints from remote hosts and adjusting control parameters independently, allowing for quick and efficient control without relying on remote communication.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If multiple devices and communication links are used for process control, then control functionality is achieved, but system complexity and delays increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidcontrol delays
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple previously separate devices (PID controller, I/P positioner, valve, sensor) into a single integrated digital process controller. This consolidation eliminates the need for multiple communication links between devices, directly reducing system complexity and communication delays while maintaining all necessary control functionalities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated controller performs multiple functions that were previously distributed across separate devices: PID control calculations, I/P conversion, valve positioning, and process measurement. This multi-functionality reduces the number of components needed and simplifies the overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Power

If centralized administrative computing devices are used, then data processing capability is improved, but system complexity and communication requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata processing capabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts computational capabilities from centralized administrative devices and places them directly in the field controller. The integrated controller now performs PID calculations, diagnostics, and control decisions locally, eliminating the need for complex communication with remote hosts for routine control operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The integrated controller is capable of autonomous operation, performing all necessary control calculations and diagnostics without requiring continuous communication with centralized systems. It serves itself by making local control decisions based on real-time process data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple separate devices are used for control loop operation, then control functionality is achieved, but installation and maintenance complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol functionalityVSAvoidinstallation and maintenance
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

By merging multiple control functions into a single integrated device, the patent simplifies installation (fewer components to install and connect) and maintenance (fewer components to troubleshoot and replace) while preserving all necessary control capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentEP3274774B1Integrated process controller with loop and valve control capability
Publication Date: 2023.06.07 FISHER CONTROLS INT LLC
  • EP3274774B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3274774B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3274774B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

An integrated controller configured to operate in a field includes a network interface module, one or more function modules, and an output module. The network interface module is configured to receive, from a remote host via a communication link, a setpoint for a process variable. The one or more function modules are configured to (i) receive a measurement of a process variable from a field device and (ii) execute logic for a control loop including the field device based at least in part on the measurement of the process variable and the setpoint for the process variable, to generate an output signal independently of the remote host, where the output signal is for controlling the field device. The output module is configured to directly apply the generated output signal to the field device.