Integrated Magnetic Core Layout for LLC Current Balance

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional integrated magnetic components for LLC resonant converters are not suitable for three-phase converters due to current and magnetic flux imbalances, and they require a high amount of expensive magnetic material, resulting in high weight, volume, and cost.

Innovation Solution

An integrated magnetic component comprising at least one first type magnetic core element with three legs and at least one second type magnetic core element with five legs, stacked such that their legs are arranged in a row, with the second type core elements providing return legs to compensate for current and magnetic flux imbalances.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If conventional stacked E-core arrangements are used, then the magnetic component can be assembled, but current and magnetic flux imbalances occur in three-phase converters

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly capabilityVSAvoidcurrent balance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies asymmetry by using magnetic core elements with different numbers of legs (first type with three legs, second type with five legs). This asymmetric configuration allows the five-legged cores to provide additional return legs that compensate for current imbalances and magnetic flux imbalances in three-phase converters, while maintaining ease of assembly through the standardized stacking approach.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #4Asymmetry

2Reliability

If stacked W-core arrangements are used for three-phase converters, then current and magnetic flux imbalances are compensated, but a high amount of magnetic material is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecurrent balanceVSAvoidmagnetic material weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the magnetic core structure into two distinct types: first type magnetic core elements with three legs and second type magnetic core elements with five legs. This segmentation allows selective use of five-legged cores only where needed for imbalance compensation, rather than requiring all cores to be five-legged as in conventional W-core arrangements, thereby reducing total magnetic material weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by providing return legs (additional legs) only in specific locations where current and magnetic flux imbalances occur. The five-legged magnetic core elements are strategically positioned to provide local compensation for imbalances in three-phase converters, rather than uniformly increasing the size of all magnetic cores throughout the structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If conventional magnetic components are used, then the structure is simple, but volume and weight are high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestructural simplicityVSAvoidmagnetic component volume
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSVolume of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple functions into the magnetic core structure by combining choke and transformer functions in a single integrated component. The stacked arrangement of different types of magnetic core elements allows the structure to simultaneously provide magnetic flux paths for both choke and transformer operations, reducing overall volume compared to separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The proposed solution reduces the weight, volume, and cost of the magnetic component while effectively compensating for current and magnetic flux imbalances, leading to increased thermal and electric efficiency and reduced losses, particularly iron losses.

Implementation Method 1

the return legs, around which no winding is wound, together with the yoke close a magnetic circuit generated by a magnetic flux by the windings of the winding legs

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic flux: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentEP4550366A1Integrated magnetic component and LLC resonant converters
Publication Date: 2025.05.07 DELTA ELECTRONICS (THAILAND) PUBLIC CO LTD
  • EP4550366A1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP4550366A1 patent drawingFigure 3~4
  • EP4550366A1 patent drawingFigure 5~6

AI summary

The invention concerns an integrated magnetic component (1) for a converter (100, 110), comprising: at least one first type magnetic core element (2) comprising a yoke (4) and at least three legs (5, 6), wherein a first total number of legs (5, 6) is defined as a number of said legs (5, 6) of each of said at least one first type magnetic core element (2); at least one second type magnetic core element (3) comprising a yoke (4) and at least three legs (5, 6) wherein a second total number of legs (5, 6) is defined as a number of said legs (5, 6) of each of said at least one second type magnetic core element (3); wherein at least one first type magnetic core element (2) and at least one second type magnetic core element (3) are stacked one on another along a stacking direction (8) such that their legs (5, 6) are arranged in row, the first total number of legs (5, 6) and the second total number of legs (5, 6) are each an addition of a respective number of winding legs (5), around which electric winding (7) is wound, with a number of return legs (6), around which no electric winding (7) is wound, and the first total number of legs (5, 6) and the second total number of legs (5, 6) are non-equal. The invention also concerns a unidirectional LLC resonant converter (100) and a bidirectional LLC resonant converter (110).