Integrated Mechanical Touch Key Structure for Portable Devices

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Portable electronic devices face a challenge in balancing mechanical key functionality with touch key functionality, as both occupy significant space on the panel, limiting the screen size and utility of these devices.

Innovation Solution

A key structure that combines mechanical and touch key functionality by using a pressing portion with projections and conductive elements, allowing for reduced key area while maintaining sensitivity and accuracy, enabling both mechanical and touch key functions through a single interface.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If both mechanical keys and touch keys are applied to the portable electronic product, then both mechanical key functionality and touch key functionality are achieved, but the area occupied on the panel increases and the screen area is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekey functionalityVSAvoidpanel area
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines mechanical key functionality and touch key functionality into a single integrated key structure. The key cap serves as both a mechanical pressing element and a touch-sensitive surface, merging two separate functional elements into one unified component that provides both mechanical and capacitive touch capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The key structure is designed to perform multiple functions simultaneously: it provides mechanical key pressing capability through the key cap and spring mechanism, while also serving as a capacitive touch sensor surface. This multi-functional design allows a single key element to replace what would traditionally require separate mechanical and touch key areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Area of stationary object

If the area of keys on the panel is reduced to enlarge the screen, then the screen area is increased, but the key functionality may be compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescreen areaVSAvoidkey functionality
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

By merging mechanical and touch key functions into a single structure, the patent enables reduced key area while preserving full key functionality. The integrated design maintains mechanical pressing capability through the key cap and spring assembly while adding capacitive touch sensitivity to the same surface, allowing compact layout without sacrificing operational capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds capacitive touch sensitivity as an additional functional dimension to the mechanical key structure. By incorporating capacitive sensors beneath or within the key cap, the design utilizes a different sensing dimension (electrical field detection) alongside the mechanical pressing dimension, enabling dual functionality within the same physical footprint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Area of stationary object

If a single key structure provides both mechanical and touch functionality, then the panel area is reduced and screen area is enlarged, but the structural complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepanel areaVSAvoidkey structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent integrates multiple functional components into a unified key assembly where the key cap serves as both mechanical element and touch sensor surface. The spring mechanism provides mechanical return while capacitive traces are embedded within or beneath the key cap structure, creating a compact multi-functional unit that reduces overall panel area despite increased internal complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The key structure employs a nested arrangement where capacitive sensor traces are embedded within or beneath the key cap layers, and the spring mechanism is positioned within the key assembly cavity. This nesting approach allows multiple functional elements to occupy overlapping or adjacent spatial volumes, reducing the overall footprint while maintaining all required functionalities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution allows for a compact design that enlarges the screen area in portable devices, enhancing user experience by integrating both mechanical and touch key functions without increasing the panel's physical size.

Implementation Method 1

the sensor receives a signal of change of capacitance transmitted by the conductive cover

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCapacitance: Capacitance

Implementation Method 2

a metal spring located between a key and a pressing portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS9287066B2Key structure for electronic product
Publication Date: 2016.03.15 CLOUD NETWORK TECH SINGAPORE PTE LTD
  • US9287066B2 patent drawing
  • US9287066B2 patent drawing
  • US9287066B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A key structure in an electronic product includes a housing. The key structure includes a pressing portion, a printed circuit board (PCB), a key, and a sensor. The key and the sensor are both located on the PCB and electronically connected with each other. When the pressing portion is pressed, the key structure acts as a mechanical key. When the pressing portion is simply touched, the key structure acts as a touch key.