Integrated Software Quality Scoring for Release Readiness

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing software testing systems lack the ability to provide an actionable and easily understood analysis of software quality, making it difficult to determine when a product or code is 'ready' for release.

Innovation Solution

An integrated system that assesses software quality by generating a score (Applause Quality Score, AQS) based on various factors, including bug status, testing maturity, and user-defined criteria, with a user interface for visualizing the score and enabling release decisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If comprehensive testing systems are implemented, then software quality assessment capability is improved, but the ability to convey actionable analysis is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware quality assessment capabilityVSAvoidactionability of quality analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential quality assessment information from comprehensive testing systems and presents it through a simplified quality score (0-100 scale) and confidence level indicator. This extraction transforms complex testing data into an actionable format that developers can easily interpret and use for release decisions, directly resolving the contradiction between comprehensive assessment capability and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter representation from complex multi-dimensional testing metrics to a single quality score parameter ranging from 0-100, accompanied by a confidence level parameter. This parameter transformation simplifies the presentation of quality information while maintaining the underlying comprehensive assessment capability, making the analysis both precise and actionable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If comprehensive testing is performed, then software quality is improved, but the ability to determine readiness for release is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesoftware qualityVSAvoidreadiness determination
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the quality score and confidence level are calculated based on actual testing results and historical data, then fed back to developers to inform release decisions. This feedback loop transforms the abstract concept of software quality into a measurable readiness indicator, enabling developers to objectively determine when software is ready for release.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The quality score acts as an intermediary between comprehensive testing results and release readiness determination. It translates complex testing data into a single actionable metric that mediates the decision-making process, making it easier to detect and measure readiness while maintaining the reliability benefits of comprehensive testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Measurement precision

If quality assessment is made more comprehensive, then measurement precision is improved, but device complexity is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality score accuracyVSAvoidassessment system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the quality assessment into distinct components: a quality score (0-100) representing the primary quality metric, a confidence level indicator representing the reliability of the score, and underlying testing parameters. This segmentation allows comprehensive measurement precision to be achieved through multiple components while presenting a simplified interface, reducing the perceived complexity of the assessment system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS12461740B2Systems and method for analyzing software and testing integration
Publication Date: 2025.11.04 APPLAUSE APP QUALITY
  • US12461740B2 patent drawing
  • US12461740B2 patent drawing
  • US12461740B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An assessment system can generate a software quality value based on testing results and analysis of a multitude of factors that impact a readiness evaluation. For example, the system generates a software quality score (e.g., an Applause Quality Score “AQS”) that enables development teams to understand the level of quality they are achieving for a given release and build-over-build. In various examples, the system generates a data-driven score to enable development teams or quality assurance teams to make decisions for when a build is ready for release. In further embodiments, the system can integrate user interfaces that present a software quality score in a user dashboard that is linked to version control systems. On review and acceptance of the score, a user can trigger the release of their new code or product.