Integrated Receiver-Subcooler Layout for Low-Loss Refrigerant Flow

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing refrigeration cycle apparatuses face issues with increased footprint, cost, and inefficiency due to separate units for the receiver and subcooler, leading to refrigerant accumulation and reduced cycle efficiency, as well as limitations in using the second internal heat exchanger for only one mode of operation.

Innovation Solution

A refrigeration cycle apparatus with a refrigerant container integrated with a refrigerant heat exchanger and a bypass circuit that directs accumulated refrigerant to the compressor's suction side, reducing pressure loss and eliminating the need for additional space for a double pipe, thereby improving efficiency and reducing costs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the receiver and subcooler are configured as different units, then the subcooling function can be provided, but the footprint and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesubcooling functionVSAvoidfootprint
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the receiver and subcooler into a single integrated unit. The receiver body serves as the subcooler by providing a heat transfer pipe that extends into the refrigerant storage space, allowing subcooling of liquid refrigerant without requiring a separate subcooler component. This merging eliminates the need for additional space and reduces overall system complexity while maintaining the subcooling function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

2Device complexity

If the inflow pipe end is arranged in the upper portion of the receiver, then the structure is simplified, but excess refrigerant accumulates in the receiver when cooling and heating are switched

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovestructureVSAvoidrefrigerant accumulation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent positions the inflow pipe end at a specific height relative to the heat transfer pipe end rather than simply at the upper or lower extreme. The inflow pipe end is arranged higher than the heat transfer pipe end but lower than the receiver opening, creating an optimized vertical arrangement that prevents refrigerant accumulation while maintaining structural simplicity. This dimensional optimization resolves the contradiction between structural simplicity and refrigerant management.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Reliability

If the second internal heat exchanger is arranged separately from the refrigerant container, then the heat exchange function is provided, but the component count increases and footprint is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat exchange functionVSAvoidcomponent count
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The heat transfer pipe is nested within the receiver body, with the heat transfer pipe extending into the refrigerant storage space of the receiver. This nested arrangement allows the receiver to serve dual functions as both a storage container and a subcooler, eliminating the need for a separate second internal heat exchanger while maintaining the heat exchange function. The nested structure reduces component count and simplifies the overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

4Temperature

If saturated liquid is cooled in the second internal heat exchanger, then subcooling is achieved, but the quality at the evaporator inlet is lowered and refrigerant amount in the evaporator increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesubcoolingVSAvoidrefrigerant amount in evaporator
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The patent optimizes the subcooling degree by controlling the heat exchange parameters in the integrated receiver-subcooler system. By adjusting the heat transfer pipe surface area, refrigerant flow rate through the heat transfer pipe, and temperature difference between the heat transfer media, the system achieves appropriate subcooling without excessive cooling that would lower evaporator inlet quality too much. This parameter optimization balances subcooling benefits with evaporator performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The integrated refrigerant container and bypass circuit enhance refrigerant flow management, reducing pressure loss and space requirements, improving cycle efficiency, and allowing for efficient operation in both cooling and heating modes.

Implementation Method 1

the refrigerant heat exchanger is provided within the refrigerant container and configured to exchange heat between refrigerant flowing through the bypass circuit and refrigerant accumulated in the refrigerant container

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectHeat exchange: Heat Exchanger

Data Source

PatentUS10401047B2Refrigeration cycle apparatus
Publication Date: 2019.09.03 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC CORP
  • US10401047B2 patent drawing
  • US10401047B2 patent drawing
  • US10401047B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In a refrigeration cycle apparatus, a refrigerant heat exchanger is provided within a refrigerant container, and the refrigerant heat exchanger is configured to exchange heat between refrigerant flowing through a bypass circuit and refrigerant accumulated in the refrigerant container.