Integrated Rotor Shaft and Back Iron for Stiff 4-Pole Machines

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing electric machines for aircraft, particularly 4-pole designs, face challenges in achieving structural stiffness and torque output due to limited space for internal shafts and weaknesses in bonded laminations, leading to inefficiencies in rotor design and performance, especially in high-frequency environments.

Innovation Solution

The rotor design integrates a shaft and back iron formed from high saturation magnetic flux density material, allowing the shaft to function as part of the back iron, eliminating the need for a separate structural shaft and enhancing stiffness, while using a single unitary piece of soft magnetic material simplifies manufacturing and increases power density.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Strength

If an internal shaft is used to provide structural stiffness in a 4-pole rotor, then the rotor stiffness is improved, but the available space for the shaft is very limited making it extremely challenging to design a sufficiently stiff shaft

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotor stiffnessVSAvoidavailable space for shaft
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the shaft and back iron into a single integrated component made of soft magnetic material. The shaft is formed as an integral part of the back iron structure, eliminating the need for a separate shaft while providing sufficient structural stiffness. This combination allows the rotor to achieve the required stiffness without requiring additional space for a separate shaft component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The shaft region of the back iron performs multiple functions: it provides structural support and stiffness like a traditional shaft, while simultaneously serving as part of the magnetic flux path like traditional back iron. The soft magnetic material enables the shaft region to conduct magnetic flux between poles while maintaining structural integrity, combining mechanical and magnetic functions in a single component.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Strength

If a separate structural element (sleeve or can) is added externally to the rotor core to increase stiffness, then the rotor structural stiffness is improved, but the airgap between rotor and stator increases reducing torque output

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotor structural stiffnessVSAvoidtorque output
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of adding an external sleeve or can, the patent integrates the structural shaft function directly into the back iron structure. The shaft is formed as an integral part of the back iron, eliminating the need for external structural elements that would increase the rotor outer diameter and airgap. This integration maintains the magnetic airgap while providing the necessary structural stiffness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Ease of manufacture

If bonded laminations are used for the rotor, then manufacturing is simplified, but the structural strength in the longitudinal direction is very limited due to weaknesses in the bonds between layers

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing simplicityVSAvoidlongitudinal structural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the shaft and back iron into a single integrated component that can be manufactured as one piece using various techniques including forging, casting, or machining from solid material. This eliminates the need for bonding multiple lamination layers together, providing continuous longitudinal strength while still allowing for manufacturing through conventional processes. The integrated structure removes the weak bonds between layers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Ease of manufacture

If the shaft and back iron are formed as separate components, then manufacturing flexibility is improved, but the device complexity increases and space utilization decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanufacturing flexibilityVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the shaft and back iron into a single integrated component, reducing the total number of parts and simplifying the assembly process. While this reduces manufacturing flexibility compared to separate components, it significantly decreases device complexity and improves space utilization within the rotor. The integration eliminates the need for assembly operations and reduces the overall rotor diameter.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach increases rotor stiffness, reduces weight, and enhances torque output by allowing magnetic flux to flow between poles, making 4-pole rotors suitable for high-frequency applications without the need for external structural support, thus improving the overall performance and efficiency of electric machines.

Implementation Method 1

The back iron portion is configured to provide a path for magnetic flux to flow between adjacent poles of the core pack portion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMagnetic flux: Magnetic Field

Data Source

PatentUS11929646B2Rotor for an electric machine
Publication Date: 2024.03.12 SAFRAN ELECTRICAL & POWER
  • US11929646B2 patent drawing
  • US11929646B2 patent drawing
  • US11929646B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention relates to a rotor of an electric machine for use in an aircraft. By forming the shaft of the rotor such that it performs, at least partially, the function of the back iron, components of the rotor can be combined. Further, by forming the rotor components in this manner, an internal shaft with an increased diameter can be used to provide a rotor with greater stiffness than equivalent prior art devices.