Integrated Additive Rub-Strip Casing for Lower Part Count

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional manufacturing techniques for attritable gas turbine engines are costly and complex, and the installation of rub strips is labor-intensive, increasing part count and complexity.

Innovation Solution

An integrated rub-strip is formed using additive manufacturing, composed of the same material as the casing, with features like keyholes and spars to elastically deform and reduce interaction with rotating blades, reducing part count and assembly time.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional manufacturing techniques are used for attritable gas turbine engines, then durability and safety requirements are met, but manufacturing cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedurability and safetyVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The rub strip is merged with the casing to form a single integrated component. The rub strip is additively manufactured as part of the casing interior surface, eliminating the need for separate rub strip installation and reducing part count while maintaining the required abradable function for clearance control

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The additive manufacturing process serves multiple functions: it creates the casing structure, forms the rub strip feature on the interior surface, and integrates the rub strip material as part of the casing material itself. This multi-functionality reduces manufacturing steps and assembly operations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Manufacturing precision

If conventional rub strip installation methods are used, then clearance control is achieved, but part count and assembly labor increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveclearance controlVSAvoidpart count
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The rub strip and casing are merged into a single integrated component. The rub strip feature is formed directly on the casing interior surface through additive manufacturing, eliminating separate rub strip parts and their associated installation procedures while maintaining precise clearance control functionality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The rub strip feature is pre-formed as part of the casing during the additive manufacturing process. This preliminary formation of the rub strip eliminates subsequent installation steps and ensures precise positioning and integration with the casing structure from the outset

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If additive manufacturing is used for the integrated rub strip, then part count and assembly time are reduced, but manufacturing process complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly timeVSAvoidmanufacturing process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The additive manufacturing process is used to perform multiple functions simultaneously: creating the casing geometry, forming the rub strip feature on the interior surface, and selecting appropriate material properties for both the casing and rub strip. This consolidates multiple manufacturing operations into a single process step

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Strength

If separate rub strip material is applied to the casing, then abrasion resistance is achieved, but material cost and installation complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveabrasion resistanceVSAvoidmaterial cost
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The rub strip is made from the same material as the casing, creating a homogeneous structure. This eliminates the need for separate rub strip materials and their associated costs, while the additive manufacturing process creates the appropriate material properties for abrasion resistance directly in the rub strip feature

Inventive Principle:
Principle #33Homogeneity

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The integrated rub-strip reduces part count, simplifies assembly, and lowers production costs while maintaining effective abrasion resistance.

Implementation Method 1

the keyhole structure is configured to elastically deform responsive to contact with the rotor

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Implementation Method 2

The rub strip material is abraded by the rotating blade tips during operation

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Data Source

PatentEP3670847B1Additively manufactured rub-strip, casing with integrated rub-strip and process for forming the casing
Publication Date: 2025.08.27 RTX CORP
  • EP3670847B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3670847B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3670847B1 patent drawingFigure 3~4

AI summary

A unitary rub strip comprises a casing having an inner surface and an outer surface opposite the inner surface; a unitary rub strip is formed integral with the casing proximate the inner surface, wherein the unitary rub strip comprises a modified structure within the casing configured to abrade responsive to an interaction with a rotating element.