Integrated RWGS and CO Electrolysis for CO2-to-Ethylene Conversion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing CO2 conversion methods increase the number of steps and equipment cost due to the generation of by-products like methanol and require additional energy inputs, particularly in the conversion of CO to lower olefins such as ethylene.

Innovation Solution

A CO2 conversion method that integrates a reverse water gas shift (RWGS) reaction with CO electrolysis to generate CO and H2O, followed by producing C2H4 and H2, utilizing H2 from CO electrolysis as both reactant and heat source for RWGS, thereby reducing steps and energy input.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a catalyst is used to convert CO to lower olefins, then the conversion can proceed, but by-products such as methanol are generated and the number of steps is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCO conversion to lower olefinsVSAvoidnumber of steps
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts and eliminates the catalyst step from the conventional process. Instead of using a catalyst to convert CO to lower olefins, the patent directly electrolyzes CO to produce ethylene and other hydrocarbons, removing the intermediate catalytic conversion step and its associated by-products.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention replaces the chemical catalysis mechanism with an electrochemical mechanism. The electrolysis cell uses electrical energy to directly convert CO to ethylene, substituting the traditional catalyst-based chemical reaction pathway with an electrochemical pathway that avoids by-product formation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If a catalyst is used to convert CO to lower olefins, then the conversion can proceed, but equipment cost is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCO conversion to lower olefinsVSAvoidequipment cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The invention removes the expensive catalytic conversion equipment from the process flow. By using direct CO electrolysis, the patent eliminates the need for catalyst beds, reactors, and associated high-temperature processing equipment, thereby reducing overall equipment cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Quantity of substance

If conventional CO2 conversion methods are used, then CO can be produced, but additional energy input is required

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCO production from CO2VSAvoidenergy input
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the CO2 conversion step with the CO utilization step into a single integrated electrolysis process. The electrolysis cell simultaneously converts CO2 to CO and directly converts the generated CO to ethylene, eliminating the need for separate energy-intensive processing steps.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The electrolysis cell performs multiple functions: it acts as both a CO2 reduction device and a CO-to-ethylene conversion device. This multi-functional approach consolidates what would traditionally require separate energy-intensive processes into a single energy-efficient operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Quantity of substance

If conventional CO2 conversion methods are used, then CO can be produced, but the number of steps is increased

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveCO production from CO2VSAvoidnumber of steps
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention combines the CO2 to CO conversion and CO to ethylene conversion into a single electrolysis step. This merging of steps eliminates intermediate processing stages and simplifies the overall process flow from CO2 to final product.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method efficiently converts CO from RWGS to C2H4 with reduced equipment cost and energy consumption by optimizing C2H4 current efficiency and utilizing H2 as both reactant and heat source, enabling continuous CO2 conversion without external H2 supply.

Implementation Method 1

generating CO and H2O by a RWGS reaction from CO2 and H2

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectReverse water gas shift reaction: Chemical Bonding

Implementation Method 2

generating C2H4 and H2 by CO electrolysis from the CO and H2O

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectrolysis: Electrolysis

Data Source

PatentUS20250297393A1Co2 conversion method
Publication Date: 2025.09.25 HONDA MOTOR CO LTD
  • US20250297393A1 patent drawing
  • US20250297393A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A CO2 conversion method includes: generating CO and H2O by a RWGS reaction from CO2 and H2; generating C2H4 and H2 by CO electrolysis from the CO and H2O; and using the H2 generated by the CO electrolysis as the H2 of the RWGS reaction.