Integrated Search and Selection Interface for E-Commerce

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current electronic commerce websites have non-intuitive and difficult-to-navigate user interfaces, leading to a poor user experience and inefficient selection of products and services due to structural issues and lack of association recognition based on historical search information.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for integrated search and selection in a transactional interface that allows direct transfer of item information from a search interface to a transaction storage construct, reducing the need for user interaction and providing intuitive, streamlined selection and presentation of products and services.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of information

If traditional electronic commerce website structures are used to present products and services, then comprehensive product information can be provided, but user interface navigation becomes complex and difficult to use

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct information completenessVSAvoiduser interface navigation
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the search interface and transaction interface into a single unified interface. Users can search for products and directly add selected items to their transaction cart without navigating through multiple pages or interfaces. This consolidation eliminates the need for separate navigation structures while maintaining complete product information display capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The unified interface serves multiple functions simultaneously: it acts as both a search interface for finding products and a transaction interface for adding items to the cart. This multi-functional design reduces the complexity of the overall system structure while preserving all necessary information presentation capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Loss of information

If multiple interface screens are used for search and transaction processes, then detailed product information can be displayed, but user interaction time and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct detail presentationVSAvoiduser interaction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

By combining search and transaction functionalities into one interface, the patent eliminates the time users would otherwise spend navigating between separate screens. Users can complete the entire process of finding and selecting products within a single interface view, reducing total interaction time while maintaining full product information display.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Adaptability or versatility

If traditional navigable structures are implemented, then functional requirements are met, but user experience deteriorates due to complicated interfaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional capabilityVSAvoiduser experience
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple functional interfaces into one unified interface that handles both search and transaction operations. This approach maintains all necessary functional capabilities while dramatically simplifying the user experience by eliminating the need to navigate through complex multi-screen structures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS11397980B1Method and system for integrated search and selection in a transactional interface
Publication Date: 2022.07.26 CITY ELECTRIC SUPPLY
  • US11397980B1 patent drawing
  • US11397980B1 patent drawing
  • US11397980B1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method, computer program product, and system are disclosed. The method includes receiving a first communication at a computer system, performing a search operation, sending a second communication, receiving a third communication, and storing the at least the portion of item information in a transaction storage construct. The computer system can cause presentation of a search field in a user interface displayed by a remote computer system. The first communication is received as a result of an event in the search field. Further, a search result (a result of the performing the search operation) is communicated to the remote computer system and comprises item information corresponding to an item. The second communication can cause presentation of the search results in the user interface. The third communication represents a selection of the item in the user interface, and comprises at least a portion of the item information.