Integrated Shift Interface for Fewer Components and Precise Range Change

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing shift devices require multiple push buttons and springs for each shift position, leading to a high number of components and complexity.

Innovation Solution

A shift device with an operation body featuring multiple shift positions on a single surface, utilizing a detection portion to sense touch and pressing operations, and a restriction mechanism to control range changes, reducing the need for individual components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If multiple push buttons with individual springs are provided for each shift position, then each shift position can be independently operated, but the number of components increases and device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveindependent operation of each shift positionVSAvoidnumber of components
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple push buttons are merged into a single operation body with multiple shift positions. The detection portion integrates multiple detection functions into one component, and a single spring provides elastic force for all positions, replacing the need for multiple individual springs and buttons.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The operation body serves multiple functions: it provides the structural housing, contains all shift positions, and works with the single spring to provide elastic force for all positions. The detection portion detects both touch operations on individual positions and pressing operations on the entire operation body.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Device complexity

If a single operation body with multiple shift positions is used, then the number of components is reduced, but the detection of touch and pressing operations becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of componentsVSAvoiddetection of touch and pressing operations
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSDifficulty of detecting and measuring

Solution Approach 1:

The detection portion dynamically distinguishes between different operation types by monitoring the sequence and pattern of detections. It first detects touch operations on specific shift positions, then detects subsequent pressing operations on the operation body as a whole, using temporal and spatial differentiation to identify different user intentions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The detection portion provides feedback by monitoring the operational state and using this information to determine the type of operation being performed. The system uses the detection results to control the shift range changes, ensuring that only authorized operations result in transmission range changes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20250277524A1Shift device
Publication Date: 2025.09.04 KK TOKAI RIKA DENKI SEISAKUSHO
  • US20250277524A1 patent drawing
  • US20250277524A1 patent drawing
  • US20250277524A1 patent drawing

AI summary

In a shift device, a P position, an R position, an N position, and a D position are set on a housing, and when an electrostatic sheet detects a touch operation on the P position, the R position, the N position, or the D position and a photosensor detects a pressing operation on the housing, a shift range of a transmission is changed. Therefore, the number of components can be reduced.