Integrated Task Management System for Rule-Based Automation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current software systems for handling tasks like shipping, receiving, and inventory control require manual user decisions, leading to inefficiencies, human errors, and resource mismanagement due to the need for multiple software modules to operate independently.

Innovation Solution

A task management method that integrates business rules, user inputs, and output processing through a distributed system, utilizing a task management module to automate tasks by querying business rules, building commands, and sending them to output devices, optimizing processing between local and distant servers based on job size and complexity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If multiple discrete software modules are used for handling different tasks, then each module can perform its specific function, but the system requires manual user decisions and coordination between modules, leading to inefficiency and human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctional capabilityVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines multiple discrete software modules into a single integrated task management system that coordinates labeling, printing, and inventory control tasks. The system uses a centralized task queue and rule-based automation to eliminate the need for separate manual coordination between modules, thereby maintaining functional versatility while dramatically improving processing efficiency and reducing human error

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The task management system is designed as a universal platform that can handle multiple types of tasks (labeling, printing, inventory updates) through a single interface. The system uses configurable business rules to adapt to different task types and requirements, allowing one system to perform the functions previously requiring multiple specialized modules

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Ease of operation

If manual user decisions are required for each task, then user control and flexibility are maintained, but training requirements increase and human error risk is introduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser controlVSAvoiderror rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service automation through rule-based task management. When a barcode is scanned or input received, the system automatically determines the appropriate tasks to perform based on pre-configured business rules, eliminating the need for manual user decisions. This maintains user control through configurable rules while eliminating human error in task execution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms where task execution results are automatically monitored and used to trigger subsequent tasks or updates. The system provides confirmation and status tracking, allowing users to verify automated actions while reducing the need for manual intervention and associated errors

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If tasks are processed individually through separate modules, then each task can be handled independently, but resource utilization is inefficient and processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask independenceVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-configuring business rules and task workflows before actual processing begins. Tasks are queued in advance with predetermined execution sequences, allowing the system to process multiple tasks efficiently without requiring real-time manual coordination. This maintains task independence through structured workflows while reducing overall processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The task management system ensures continuous processing by maintaining a queued workflow where tasks are automatically passed from one stage to the next without interruption. The system keeps resources continuously engaged by piping output from one task directly into the next task in the sequence, eliminating idle time between operations while maintaining logical task independence

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS8537384B2Integrated task management systems and methods for executing rule-based operations
Publication Date: 2013.09.17 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE OF AMERICAN INC
  • US8537384B2 patent drawing
  • US8537384B2 patent drawing
  • US8537384B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for integrating multiple software modules configured to produce output according to established business rules is provided. The system in one embodiment coordinates the printing of a variety of labels and reports according to a set of complex business rules. Complex output tasks may be distributed to remote computers in a network for optimum efficiency. The system may be configured to comply with one or more standard database connectivity standards in order to provide a generic interface with foreign systems. The method in one embodiment includes acquiring an input, sending a query to a database, retrieving business rules and associated tasks, and building scripts or commands for each task.