Intelligent Activation System for Emergency Halt Mechanisms

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In disaster or cyber scenarios, existing systems lack an efficient mechanism for automatically activating a protected emergency system halt mechanism across various locations and network conditions, such as congested mobile data networks or locked-down remote connections, while ensuring security and reliability.

Innovation Solution

An intelligent activation system utilizing artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) models to detect scenarios from multiple data sources, automatically activating or deactivating a protected emergency system halt mechanism, with voice and secondary authentication for authorized control, ensuring system halt or restart actions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If automatic activation of emergency system halt mechanism is implemented, then response time and productivity are improved, but device complexity and reliability requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-configures AI/ML models and rules for scenario detection before emergencies occur. When a disaster or cyber scenario is detected, the pre-established activation logic automatically triggers the halt mechanism without requiring real-time manual decision-making, thus reducing response time while managing complexity through pre-planned workflows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

An intelligent activation system serves as an intermediary layer between monitoring systems and the emergency halt mechanism. This intermediary analyzes data from multiple sources using AI/ML models and rules, making informed decisions about activation while isolating the complexity of decision-making from the simple activation trigger, thereby reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Device complexity

If manual activation only is used, then device complexity is reduced, but loss of time and productivity decrease due to manual intervention requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidresponse time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service activation by automatically detecting disaster or cyber scenarios and triggering the emergency halt mechanism without requiring manual intervention. The AI/ML models continuously monitor data sources and autonomously make activation decisions based on pre-defined rules, eliminating delays associated with manual response while maintaining manageable complexity through automated decision logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If authentication requirements are increased, then reliability is improved, but ease of operation decreases during emergency situations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveauthentication securityVSAvoidactivation ease
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-establishes authentication credentials and authorization rules before emergencies occur. During critical situations, the system automatically verifies pre-configured authentication parameters and activates the halt mechanism without requiring real-time authentication challenges, thus maintaining high security while ensuring rapid response. The authentication burden is shifted to pre-configured credentials rather than real-time verification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11595803B2Method and apparatus for protected authenticated emergency system halt mechanism for disaster and cyber scenarios
Publication Date: 2023.02.28 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NA
  • US11595803B2 patent drawing
  • US11595803B2 patent drawing
  • US11595803B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various methods, apparatuses/systems, and media for implementing an emergency system halt mechanism are disclosed. A processor establishes a communication link with a plurality of data sources and a receiver. The receiver receives data related to disaster and/or cyber scenarios from the plurality of data sources. The processor automatically determines, by utilizing an intelligent activation system (IAS), whether to activate an emergency system halt mechanism (ESHM) upon detection of a disaster and/or a cyber scenario based on analyzing the received data and using pre-determined rules and artificial intelligence (AI)/machine learning (ML) models. The processor also automatically determines whether to activate or deactivate the ESHM based on a result of determination of the IAS. Once activated, a secure voice-based authentication processes designed to work in the limitations of cyber and disaster scenarios allow registered users to take actions such as halt or resume systems.