Intelligent environmental control system

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Intelligent controllers face challenges in balancing conflicting control goals and constraints, particularly in achieving efficient control of environmental parameters like temperature in smart-home environments, where energy efficiency and response time often conflict.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of intelligent controllers that continuously monitor progress towards control goals and dynamically adjust control strategies using sensor data and user inputs, employing auto-component-activation levels and advanced modeling techniques to optimize energy usage and response times.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If the controller activates all available systems to achieve rapid environmental parameter changes, then response time is improved, but energy consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The controller dynamically adjusts system activation based on real-time monitoring of environmental parameters and predicted future states. Instead of static on/off control, the system continuously adapts which systems to activate and at what intensity, optimizing the balance between response time and energy consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The controller uses predictive modeling to anticipate future environmental parameter changes and pre-activates systems or adjusts their intensity in advance. This allows the system to meet response time requirements while avoiding unnecessary full-power activation, thereby reducing energy consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If the controller uses multiple systems simultaneously to achieve control goals, then reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol goal achievementVSAvoidsystem configuration
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller changes operational parameters such as intensity levels and activation timing of multiple systems based on real-time conditions. By adjusting parameters dynamically rather than simply adding more systems, the controller achieves reliable control while managing complexity through intelligent parameter management

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors environmental parameters and system performance, using this feedback to adjust which systems are activated and at what intensity. This closed-loop control ensures reliable achievement of control goals while the intelligent selection logic manages system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS9746198B2Intelligent environmental control system
Publication Date: 2017.08.29 GOOGLE LLC
  • US9746198B2 patent drawing
  • US9746198B2 patent drawing
  • US9746198B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The current application is directed to intelligent controllers that continuously, periodically, or intermittently monitor progress towards one or more control goals under one or more constraints in order to achieve control that satisfies potentially conflicting goals. An intelligent controller may alter aspects of control, dynamically, while the control is being carried out, in order to ensure that goals are obtained and a balance is achieved between potentially conflicting goals. The intelligent controller uses various types of information to determine an initial control strategy as well as to dynamically adjust the control strategy as the control is being carried out.