Intelligent Library Management for Software Compatibility

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current software development systems rely heavily on human involvement for application library management, making it a tedious process to find compatible third-party libraries, with issues like compatibility, licensing, and pricing creating bottlenecks and suboptimal results.

Innovation Solution

An intelligent library management system that automatically learns from multiple projects, repositories, and data sources to provide a ranked list of compatible application libraries, using machine learning to predict compatibility and handle licensing and pricing constraints.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual library management is used, then developers have full control over library selection, but the process becomes tedious and time-consuming

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelibrary management easeVSAvoidtime to find compatible libraries
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically analyzing project requirements, searching for compatible libraries, and generating recommendations without requiring manual intervention. The compatibility assessment and ranking processes are automated, allowing the system to serve itself in finding and evaluating libraries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The manual mechanical process of searching and evaluating libraries is replaced with an automated computational system that uses compatibility assessment algorithms and machine learning models to evaluate libraries, substitute human effort with automated intelligence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Reliability

If comprehensive library search is performed, then more compatible libraries are found, but the search process becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelibrary compatibility assuranceVSAvoidsearch system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex search process is segmented into distinct modules: requirement analysis, library search, compatibility assessment, and ranking. Each module handles a specific aspect of the process, making the overall system more manageable and less complex while maintaining comprehensive evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

A compatibility assessment intermediary layer is introduced between the library search and selection processes. This intermediary automatically evaluates compatibility across multiple dimensions (technical, licensing, pricing) and provides structured recommendations, simplifying the overall system architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If automated compatibility assessment is implemented, then library selection efficiency improves, but computational resources increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelibrary selection speedVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs partial compatibility assessment by focusing on the most critical compatibility dimensions first (technical compatibility, licensing constraints) and only conducting full assessments when needed. This selective approach maintains productivity while reducing unnecessary computational overhead.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

Compatibility rules and constraints are pre-configured and stored in the system before execution. The assessment process retrieves and applies these pre-prepared rules rather than computing them in real-time, significantly reducing computational resource consumption during actual library selection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11630649B2Intelligent application library management
Publication Date: 2023.04.18 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINE CORPORATION
  • US11630649B2 patent drawing
  • US11630649B2 patent drawing
  • US11630649B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Various embodiments are provided for providing intelligent library management in a computing environment by a processor. Application compatibility may be learned from a plurality of projects, repositories, application libraries, data sources, or a combination thereof. A list of recommended application libraries, ordered according to the application compatibility, may be automatically provided for implementation, integration, or replacements of one or more sections of an application library.