Intelligent Load Control System for Test Specimens

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current load control systems in quality assurance testing can lead to equipment failure due to unstable control parameters when altering one test parameter, and premature termination of load sequences if preset conditions are exceeded, resulting in incomplete or failed tests.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a test equipment assembly, a control system with sensors and actuators, and a data analyzer that monitors and adjusts loads in real-time to ensure the test specimen remains within an acceptable stress range, using a controller to actuate loads and a data analyzer to process sensor data and adjust the load sequence as needed.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a control system automatically terminates the load sequence when preset conditions are exceeded, then equipment safety is improved, but test completeness deteriorates due to premature termination of valid tests

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment safetyVSAvoidtest completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically changes control parameters by transitioning from rigid preset condition monitoring to flexible real-time parameter adjustment. The data analyzer continuously monitors actual stress values and communicates with the controller to adjust load parameters dynamically, allowing the system to adapt to actual test conditions rather than terminating based on fixed thresholds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a closed-loop feedback mechanism where sensors continuously monitor stress conditions, the data analyzer processes this information in real-time, and the controller adjusts load parameters based on the analysis. This feedback loop enables intelligent differentiation between actual failure conditions and temporary parameter excursions, preventing premature test termination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If the control system monitors multiple test parameters simultaneously, then measurement precision is improved, but control stability deteriorates when one parameter is altered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter monitoring accuracyVSAvoidcontrol parameter stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The system transforms the control approach from independent parameter control to interdependent parameter management. When one parameter is altered, the data analyzer evaluates the impact on other parameters and the controller automatically adjusts them to maintain overall system stability, treating the multi-parameter system as an integrated whole rather than separate controls.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The real-time feedback mechanism allows the system to detect parameter interactions and compensate for instability. When sensors detect changes in one parameter, the data analyzer processes this information and the controller responds by adjusting other parameters to maintain stability, creating a self-regulating multi-parameter control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If manual control allows operators to adjust test parameters during loading, then operational flexibility is improved, but control precision deteriorates due to human error

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter adjustment flexibilityVSAvoidload control precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements self-service control where the automated data analyzer and controller perform the precise parameter adjustments that would otherwise require manual operator intervention. The system monitors conditions and automatically makes the necessary load adjustments, eliminating human error while maintaining the flexibility to respond to test conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The automated feedback loop replaces manual control with machine-based parameter adjustment. Sensors provide real-time data to the data analyzer, which automatically communicates with the controller to make precise adjustments without human intervention, combining the flexibility of adaptive control with the precision of automated systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3387502B1Intelligent automated load control system and method
Publication Date: 2023.11.01 MECHANICAL TESTING SERVICES LLC
  • EP3387502B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3387502B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3387502B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A system for automating load conditions on a test specimen includes a test equipment assembly that includes one or more test components configured to apply load to the test specimen. The system includes a control system to actuate the load, and includes a controller that receives and transmits data to sensors and actuators operatively connected to the test equipment assembly. The system includes a data analyzer connected to the control system to transmit a loading sequence to the controller for actuating the test equipment assembly. The data analyzer receives and processes the data from the controller to determine whether the test specimen is within an acceptable stress range as the test equipment assembly performs the loading sequence, and transmits data to the controller to reduce the load on the test specimen if the acceptable stress range is exceeded.