Intelligent oven

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional ovens require manual configuration and maintenance, relying on operator expertise, which can lead to inconsistencies in product quality and maintenance efficiency, and lack automated features for warranty compliance and assembly guidance.

Innovation Solution

An intelligent oven system with embedded sensors, processors, and cloud connectivity that automates bake parameter sharing, maintenance identification, assembly instructions, and warranty compliance monitoring, utilizing cloud computing for data management and recommendation generation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional ovens rely on operator expertise for configuration and maintenance, then operational flexibility is maintained, but product quality consistency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduct quality consistencyVSAvoidoperator expertise requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The oven system performs self-diagnosis and self-monitoring through embedded sensors and processors that automatically detect maintenance issues, configuration errors, and operational anomalies without requiring operator expertise. The system serves itself by identifying and reporting problems autonomously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors operational parameters through sensors and provides feedback to both local displays and remote cloud services. This feedback loop enables real-time adjustments and alerts operators only when actual issues occur, rather than requiring constant expert monitoring.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If manual maintenance procedures are used, then device complexity is reduced, but maintenance efficiency deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemaintenance efficiencyVSAvoidautomation system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Manual maintenance inspection and diagnosis are replaced with automated sensor-based monitoring systems. Physical checks by operators are substituted with electronic sensors that continuously monitor temperature, pressure, and component status, eliminating the need for manual mechanical inspection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

An automated maintenance management system acts as an intermediary between the oven components and operators. The system processes sensor data, interprets component status, and communicates maintenance needs to operators through user-friendly interfaces, simplifying the interaction despite increased system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If oven settings are manually configured based on operator knowledge, then adaptability to different baking needs is maintained, but time consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconfiguration timeVSAvoidmanual configuration requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-configures baking parameters based on selected items and stores optimal settings in advance. When an operator selects an item to bake, the system automatically retrieves and applies pre-determined temperature, time, and mode settings, eliminating the need for manual configuration during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The oven system integrates multiple functions including automatic parameter selection, cloud-based recipe storage, and adaptive learning capabilities. A single automated system handles what would otherwise require separate manual processes for item identification, parameter selection, and optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Reliability

If conventional ovens lack automated monitoring, then device complexity is minimized, but warranty compliance reliability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewarranty complianceVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors operational parameters and provides real-time feedback on warranty compliance status. Sensors track temperature profiles, operation durations, and usage patterns against warranty specifications, automatically generating compliance reports and alerts.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

A compliance monitoring subsystem acts as an intermediary between oven operations and warranty requirements. It translates complex operational data into compliance status indicators and communicates with both local displays and remote warranty management systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS11585701B2Intelligent oven
Publication Date: 2023.02.21 TPS INT LLC
  • US11585701B2 patent drawing
  • US11585701B2 patent drawing
  • US11585701B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for managing an intelligent oven are provided. In one example, an oven system can comprise a memory that stores computer executable components. The oven system can also comprise a processor, operably coupled to the memory, and that executes the computer executable components stored in the memory. The computer executable components can comprise an oven management component that identifies a parameter of a completed bake based on a second parameter of a new bake and shares the parameter with an input device.