Intelligent Planting Management System for Adaptive Watering Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing intelligent planting systems lack adaptive management capabilities, failing to account for specific plant species, growth cycles, and varying environmental conditions, leading to inefficient watering and fertilization practices in diverse urban settings.

Innovation Solution

An intelligent planting management system utilizing big data analysis, machine learning, and Internet-based technology to collect, classify, and regulate planting conditions across multiple environments, adjusting based on real-time data and plant features to optimize care.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If automatic watering systems are implemented without considering plant species and environmental conditions, then watering automation is achieved, but watering precision and plant growth effectiveness deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewatering automationVSAvoidwatering precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements local quality by tailoring watering parameters to specific plant species, growth stages, and environmental conditions. Each plant receives customized watering schedules and amounts based on its unique requirements, rather than uniform treatment. This is achieved through plant-specific parameter databases and environmental sensor integration that adjusts watering locally for each plant or plant group.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies dynamics by continuously adjusting watering parameters based on real-time environmental conditions (temperature, humidity, soil moisture) and plant growth stage. The watering schedule is not static but dynamically adapted to changing conditions, allowing the system to maintain high automation while achieving precise, effective watering.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Device complexity

If preset threshold-based control is used for watering, then system simplicity is maintained, but adaptability to different plant species and growth cycles deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidadaptability to plant species
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses preliminary action by pre-configuring plant-specific parameter databases containing optimal watering, lighting, and fertilization parameters for various plant species and growth stages. When a plant is added to the system, the appropriate parameters are automatically selected from the database, providing adaptability without requiring complex real-time decision-making logic.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback by continuously monitoring environmental conditions and plant status, then comparing actual parameters against target parameters from the database. This feedback loop enables the system to adapt to different plant species while maintaining simple operation, as the complexity is handled automatically through sensor data comparison and adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If manual control and preset plans are used for watering, then system complexity is reduced, but management efficiency and responsiveness to environmental changes deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidmanagement efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies self-service by automatically monitoring environmental conditions and executing watering operations without requiring manual intervention. The system autonomously adjusts parameters based on real-time sensor data and plant-specific databases, eliminating the need for manual control while maintaining low operational complexity for the user.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback to continuously monitor environmental conditions and automatically adjust watering operations. This closed-loop control enables the system to respond dynamically to environmental changes without manual input, significantly improving management efficiency while keeping the user interface simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Area of stationary object

If distributed planting management is implemented across multiple environments, then planting scale is increased, but management complexity and data processing requirements worsen

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplanting scaleVSAvoidmanagement complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements universality by using a centralized management platform that handles multiple planting environments through a unified interface and database structure. The same core algorithms and parameter databases serve all locations, allowing the system to scale to distributed planting while avoiding proportional increases in management complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies segmentation by dividing the distributed planting management into independent modular units, each with local sensors and actuators that operate autonomously based on plant-specific parameters. The centralized platform coordinates these modules through standardized protocols, enabling scalable management of multiple environments without overwhelming complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS10966377B2Intelligent growing management method and intelligent growing device
Publication Date: 2021.04.06 XU JIXIANG
  • US10966377B2 patent drawing
  • US10966377B2 patent drawing
  • US10966377B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An intelligent planting apparatus an intelligent planting management method controls planting processes of plants in a plurality of planting devices within different environments, and includes data collection step, classification-marking step, and regulation step. Collected data comprise: plants' planting information, environment information of planting devices, planting condition information and plant features. Classifying the collected data, scoring and comparing the plant features in each planting devices according to preset conditions under same category, and marking and storing respective planting condition information of the planting device with high planting feature score in a plant growing cycle. Comparing the current planting condition information with the stored marked planting condition information according to planting and environment information of respective planting device. If difference therebetween exceeds threshold, a regulation data is generated according to the stored marked planting condition information and the current planting condition information to regulate planting condition of respective planting device.