Intelligent Scoring System for Automated Business Performance Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Insurance companies and other businesses face challenges in efficiently evaluating and improving the performance of their various business units, as current methods are time-consuming and lack effective strategies for tracking improvement.

Innovation Solution

An intelligent scoring system that utilizes a scorecard tool with a neural network model to automatically assess business unit performance by receiving parameter ratings, associating weightings, and generating outcome scores and recommendations for improvement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated scoring systems are implemented, then productivity and speed of evaluation improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveevaluation speedVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary automated scoring system that acts as a mediator between manual evaluation processes and performance assessment outcomes. The system includes automated data collection modules, scoring algorithms, and reporting mechanisms that bridge the gap between raw business unit data and actionable performance insights, thereby improving productivity while managing complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical evaluation processes with automated electronic systems. The scoring system uses computer algorithms, automated data processing, and electronic reporting to substitute human-performed evaluation tasks, significantly increasing productivity and speed while reducing the operational complexity of manual coordination and data collection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive performance parameters are measured, then measurement precision improves, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance assessment accuracyVSAvoidevaluation time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements preliminary action by pre-configuring the scoring system with established performance parameters, weighting schemes, and evaluation criteria before actual assessments begin. The system pre-processes data collection protocols and prepares scoring algorithms in advance, allowing comprehensive multi-parameter measurement to be executed rapidly without time loss during the actual evaluation process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent enables continuous useful action by implementing automated data collection and processing that operates continuously without interruption. The system continuously gathers performance data, applies scoring algorithms, and generates reports in an unbroken workflow, eliminating the time losses associated with manual data gathering, calculation, and compilation while maintaining comprehensive measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentUS12223457B2Intelligent scoring systems and methods for scoring a level of performance of a business unit of a plurality of business units in an organization
Publication Date: 2025.02.11 ALLSTATE INDIA PTE LTD
  • US12223457B2 patent drawing
  • US12223457B2 patent drawing
  • US12223457B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An intelligent scoring system includes a scorecard tool, a user input device, a memory component, a processor; and machine-readable instructions. The scorecard tool includes a scorecard and a neural network model. The machine-readable instructions stored in the memory component cause the intelligent scoring system to: receive a parameter rating for the scorecard for a first portion of a plurality of business performance parameters; automatically input the parameter rating for the scorecard for a second portion of the plurality of business performance parameters; associate a weighting with each parameter rating; estimate a parameter outcome score for each of the first portion and the second portion of the plurality of business performance parameters based on each parameter rating and weighting; automatically estimate an overall outcome score; and automatically generate a recommendation for improving the level of performance of the business unit.